
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Fianchettoed Rook
Fianchetto? Yes. A Rook? What on earth?
Well, it does happen. I even had someone rated over 2300 in daily time controls voluntarily fianchetto both Rooks against me. But they were a friend of mine and just goofing off.
Still, it's definitely a bit off the normal track. So, I was inspired to write a poem...after looking at a slew of games with fianchettoed Rooks. Blimey, mate. What is with all these Rooks on Diagon Alley?
I thought that I should never see,
An angled Rook, the likes of thee;
A Rook whose hungry gaze is pressed,
Amongst some pawns, an ugly nest.
A Knight stands guard,
Time served is hard;
The Tower cowers, no flight in sight,
Surely some say, this canst be right;
At least thou serve to protect some Pawns,
Though this may earn no more than yawns.
Poems are made by fools like me,
But any player can fianchetto like thee.
Another month or more of working on my next chess book and finding more quaint and surprisingly useful configurations that just seem to pop up in my favorite openings and the games of my favorite players. Though the two are not necessarily conflated as their openings are far more broadly based than mine. Anyway, enough of that stream of conscious stuff for the moment; though I assure you it is likely to leak out again.
I started looking at Rooks who seemed to have a bit of Bishop in them. Maybe they always wanted to don robes and wear a mitre? But again, I digress. Below you'll find some very typical situations I discovered with fianchettoed Rooks. I'll very briefly discuss some salient features for each of the four corners of the board and then move on to some illustrative puzzles for your solving enjoyment. The features discussed are tied to the configuration of the pawns and pieces, not to a particular corner of the board. And many of the features carry over from one configuration to another. Given that, I tried to avoid too much repetition of common features.
The next couple paragraphs talk about the diagram below. If you just want to solve puzzles skip to the banner in White and Purple that is further below!!
Bottom Left. A very common configuration. Usually precipitated by an untimely push of the pawn to b3. Normally we see this after the Bishop drove the Rook to b1 along the open diagonal and then the Knight pulled the Rook up to b2 by placing the Knight on c3. White constantly has to fear discoveries so must be very wary about moving the Bishop from c1. That leaves two pieces doing nothing. If Black is able to place a pawn on b4 then White will not even have the option of b3-b4 and Rb3 to escape limboland.
Top Left. This can occur after a trade of Bishops on b7. Often Black sought this trade in order to eliminate a fianchettoed White Bishop on g2. The idea being to weaken the light squares around White's King. That plan is often overly optimistic. In this particular configuration it is important to also note that the White pawn on b5 eliminates any option of pushing Black's b-pawn to create an exit route. The White Rook on the a-file compounds Black's problems. It could be worse. In some instances, the White Queen pops into a6 and creates an immediate crisis.
Top Right. The Rook assumed the position in order to avoid mate. This is a more common defensive technique than I expected to see and often quite effective.
TO THE GAMES!!!
Blackburne,J -Vasquez,A Match (3) 08.03.1891
Perforce, I speculate that Black was inspired to attack with 27...Qh5? despite a laggard development. The intersection of hopes, dreams and realities is fraught with peril, particularly when one neglects the question of whether your own house is in order.
How did White respond to this impetuous outburst?
Assessment: With the obvious threat 31. Bxf7 and Black's King will fall. Plundering the exchange on b7 remains an option as well.
Outcome: The expected outcome would be the same as that seen in the game, a victory for White.
Lessons learned or revisited:
A. The Queen sally to h4 was inadequately prepared and ignored a palpable threat. From the defender's side it is important to note that immediately advancing the b-pawn two squares would have provided a much more flexible position. I refer you to the analytic notes after 27...Qh4. An idea worth storing in your warehouse of chess facts, notions and mythconceptions.
B. The fianchettoed Rook proves typically unsuitable for any role other than serving as target practice for the White pieces.
C. White was able to transform the unfortunate configuration on Black's Queenside into clearly winning material and positional gains.
Kevin's Problem Rating: 2 (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Why that rating? Fairly straightforward given the basic rules of precedence many coaches proselytize regarding analysis of a position. Zero checks available, no meaningful captures, no Black threats. As a consequence, we devolve to creating a threat, renewing the threat, and finally finding a meaningful capture that includes multiple threats of further mayhem.
Traskovetskaja,D (2024) - Gritsenko,A (2409) Izmailov Memorial op 16th 06.08. 2012
Black is clearly advocating for elite membership in the Pin to Win Club. Petrified, White played 19.Bc1. Thus managing to play the very worst of the three ways to defend the Knight staple-gunned in place.
The Knight now appears to have sufficient defenders for the butterflied specimen on e3 and His Majesty is prepared to melt the pin by slipping away to h1. How should Black continue?
Assessment: Effectively White has three immobilized pieces now. The a2 Rook, the dark-squared Bishop and the e3 Knight.
Outcome: White resigned on move 33.
Lessons learned or revisited:
Kevin's Problem Rating: 1 (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Why that rating? Well, chess fans, the topic at hand is fianchettoed Rooks. So consecutive moves that threaten the Rook seem likely candidates. Consequently I dubbed this easy, like a comfortable chair that invites you in to rest easily from long established habits.
White has managed to lure a Black Rook into an awkward fianchetto. I've seen this in quite a few games in the database so it is not at all unusual. But discombobulated pieces by themselves are not necessarily enough to guarantee victory. How does White transform this position into some more tangible gain?
Outcome: Black resigned on move 36.
Lessons learned or revisited:
Kevin's Problem Rating: 3- (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Outcome: White won on move 36.
Lessons learned or revisited:
Kevin's Problem Rating: 1+ (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Micic, Snezana 2210 - Pihajlic, Amalija 2155 YUG-chT (Women) 1997 #1
Clearly Black wants to bring the Knight back to b8 and free the Rook from that ugly fianchetto position.
How should White proceed?
Outcome: Black lost an Exchange in short order and resigned on move 34.
Lessons learned or revisited:
Kevin's Problem Rating: 3- (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Micic, Snezana 2210 - Pihajlic, Amalija 2155 YUG-chT (Women) 1997 #2
Black has adopted a standard, thematic plan of exchanging Knights to free the fianchettoed Rook. How did White respond to this offer?
Lessons learned or revisited:
Kevin's Problem Rating: 1 (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Hoepner,A - Krings,T NRW-ch U15 1996
Black's last move was ...b6, an interesting attempt to develop the Bishop to b7. Perhaps the move could even be described as special.
How did White take advantage?
Outcome: In the game line Black was checkmated on move 58. In this analytic line Black is unlikely to stick around for that many moves.
Lessons learned or revisited:
B. White's 19th move is particularly important to extracting the full advantage from this position. This move secures the White Knight for a number of moves. Consequently, the Knight keeps Black's fianchettoed Rook under lock and key.
Kevin's Problem Rating: 4- (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Bondarevsky, Igor - Pogrebissky, Iosif URS-ch12 Semifinal 1940
Black just tucked their King in the corner. That seems a bit slow in this dynamic position. And it ties the Black Queen to defense of the Rook while it remains on f8, even if only for one more move.
Would you have found Bondarevsky's response?
Outcome: Black resigned before making their 28th move.
Lessons learned or revisited:
Kevin's Problem Rating: 4- (1=Easy, 5=Hard)
Related blogs: You can find links to an entire series of blogs about trapping various pieces at:
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knight Trapped by Bishop + Pawn - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knight Trapped by Bishop, Knight and King - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knight Trapped by Rook Part 1 of 2 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knight Trapped by Rook Part 2 of 2 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knight Trapped by Knight - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knight Trapped by Pawns - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Bishop Dominated by Pawns Part 1 of 5 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Bishop Dominated by Pawns Part 2 of 5 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Bishop Dominated by Pawns Part 3 of 5 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Bishop Dominated by Pawns Part 4 of 5 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Bishop Dominated by Pawns Part 5 of 5 - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Bishop Dominated by Rook + Pawn - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Epaulette Configuration - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Knights and Foot Soldiers Hunting Her Majesty - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: A Beautiful Loss - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Boden Configuration - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: Said the Spider to the Fly - Chess.com
Secrets of Trapping Pieces: My Experience Writing a Chess Book - Chess.com