Boris Spassky was the tenth world Chess champion. Although this fact is known among those who are interested in chess history, who Spassky is is not well known outside of that group. Now, the topic of this thread is: Is he given the credit he deserved?
First of all, let us start in this way: Bobby Fischer is considered to be the greatest player ever by many including Anand, Carlsen, Kasparov, Mikhail Tal, Alexander Kotov and many others. Boris Spassky lost to him, he lost title to Bobby Fischer and we are not here to deny the greatness of Fischer, we are here to talk about Boris, not Bobby. Now, if Bobby is considered the greatest chess player ever, up until 1972 Boris Spassky was superior to him. Before 72, they played 5 games and Spassky scored 3 wins and two draws. About their head to head matches, in one of their matches, Spassky used an opening which is/was not used regularly in top level games. According to chessgames.com's popularity graph of openings, it was not used regularly even in 60s.
at 23, Spassky used this opening against an opponent who was expected to dethrone the soviets, Boris used it against a strong opponent.
This was not the only game in which Spassky used King's gambit against a strong opponent. One more example that comes to the mind is his game against Bronstein.
now, pre-72 Spassky was at least as good as Bobby Fischer who is widely considered to be the greatest player ever. if Bobby is considered to be the greatest or in top3, why we should not consider the one who was better than him in majority of their careers?
Fischer was not the only one who was inferior to Boris before 72, one more example is Mikhail Tal. He is considered to be the greatest attacking player of all times and when we compare him against Spassky pre-72, he too was inferior to Boris.
Classical games: Boris Spassky beat Mikhail Tal 9 to 6, with 27 draws.Including rapid/exhibition games: Boris Spassky beat Mikhail Tal 9 to 7, with 27 draws.Only rapid/exhibition games: Mikhail Tal beat Boris Spassky 1 to 0. *The figures above are based only on games present in our database which may be incomplete.
It is taken from chessgames.com and when I click on "Spassky losses", pre-72 he lost 3 times only and won 9 times. Boris Spassky's, who is not so well known, record was 9-3 up until 72.Now, it is widely believed that after 69 or after he became a champion he did not spend much time on ches, the decline of him after 72 may be the reason why he is so underrated. but the bad times he had after 72 does not take anything from his pre-72 shinings.
When we look at his games, at times his attacking was
as good as Tal's, he was as universal as Fischer, he was very versatile. He played King's Gambit which is considered to be a weak opening for a grandmaster level. He must at least be in top5 for his pre-72 career.
One more game in which he destroyed a strong opponent with the unexpected beauty:
At the time this game was played Boris' opponent was in top 5 and was playing board 1 in the team of the world (outside the soviet union) and had consecutive successes in tournament in the last two years.
The reason this games are being presented it he was in no way inferior to Bobby, Misha Tal or others in terms of sacrifce, attacking, calculation and overall.
He did even not take chess championships seriously according to Vladimir Kramnik and yet he was superior to Fischer who was very very hardworking and is said to have spent more time than the entire soviet team. so, it is reasonable to deduce that Spassky was more talented than Bobby, Karpov or many other champions. Boris Spassky was like Morphy, Capablanca or Reshevsky, they must have had pure talents. Yes, Karpov or Kasparov reached far more successes than Spassky but they reached with hard work while Spassky reached without hard work, one can deduce that Spassky was at least as talented as other top3 chess players ever.
According to Anatoly Karpov Spassky was very very lazy. May be Boris Spassky was shadowed by Bobby Fischer but being second to Fischer should not take anything from Fischer.