Forum

This set has ten pawns of each colour and two spare queens for each colour. The spare queens are similar in size to the main queen but they don't have the same coronet, they are just flat at the top. The set is curious because I've never seen one with that style of spare queens or with ten pawns. I was hoping someone here might know something? 

This new book should be of interest to members of this club: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-equipment/new-book-on-chess-collecting

This thread contains a huge collection of photos on the chess sets used in world championship matches, well worth a look: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/chess-sets-used-in-both-unofficial-and-official-world-championships?page=1

I'm asking for tips; not giving tips. Do you have any?

For those interested, the table for the upcoming match: https://twitter.com/FIDE_chess/status/1460975798412791819

There was a publicity video about this match where a close-up of the pieces was seen. Euwe, playing the Black side, ventured the Budapest Gambit. Since I could not see evidence of that line being played in any game in the WC (1935 or 1937), I searched the gamescore in the database and found it was played in 1921. That's almost fifteen years before the match that made Euwe a world champion. I'll provide few images. Does anyone know more about the set seen in the pictures? Alekhine Euwe plays the Budapest Gambit Close-up of the pieces

For easy reference all online chess stores in one place. Any additions are welcome. Custom Chess (boards only) http://www.customchess.com/index.asp Jaques London https://www.jaqueslondon.co.uk Staunton Castle https://stauntoncastle.com House of Staunton https://www.houseofstaunton.com HoS antiques https://chessantiques.com Antique Chess shop https://www.antiquechessshop.com Official Staunton https://www.officialstaunton.com Design Chess https://www.designchess.com the chess store https://thechessstore.com the chess store uk https://thechessstore.co.uk chessbazaar https://www.chessbazaar.com royal chess mall https://www.royalchessmall.com http://www.ebaystores.com/royalchessmall wholesale chess https://www.wholesalechess.com NOJ https://www.noj.si chess sets uk https://www.chesssets.co.uk chess by india https://chessbyindia.com Staunton Chessmen https://stauntonchessmen.us

If anyone is interested chess pieces vectors, let me know. I've managed to render in digital form the Biro Sandor and Zagreb knights. All I need is a picture of a piece with a white background.

Noticed this fancy new chess table that may interest the discerning collector and my good friends here in the Pieces and Collections Club: https://www.houseofstaunton.com/the-camaratta-signature-championship-table.html

Does anyone know this chess set from the TV series?

The first purchase I made went totally wrong with the board size because I had no idea and simply relied on the seller’s recommendation. Since then I tried some online explanations (mostly quite unclear)  and just seeing a lot of pictures. Correct me if I am wrong but I think most FIDE tournaments go with 3.75 inch kings and 2.25 square boards. But you may want to buy other sizes or you may not like the FIDE proportion. After getting my own boards in most all sizes it got easier and just put pieces and boards together as it pleased the eyes most. When proportions are off it can still look ok, but it gets very hard to play chess and see clearly what is going on. Either when board too large or too small. Even very small differences can get quite disturbing for the eye. For example without the pieces I think no one can distinguish between a board with 2.25 squares or 2.375 squares. But some 4 inch king pieces can go on either, and some really can’t (for my eyes). As I just discovered not all 4 inch sets are the same (at all), so a certain King size fits a certain square size is also not reliable. This goes for all the other king sizes as well I assume. More important than how tall a king is, is how much space a set takes on a board. So I came to the following formula: length of 8 squares divided by the length of the 8 offficers (king, queen, bishops, knights and rooks tightly lined up.  So my Marshall’s officers measuring 12.57 inch go well on a 2.25 square board of 18 inch length. 18/12.57 = 1.43 which is for me the best looking quotient. So the fields are 1.43 times larger than the pieces. Anything larger than 1.5 is drowning the pieces in space too much. Smaller than 1.35 is too tight. For me. All you need to know is the number that suits you best. Takes some time and can not be done (imho) with online photo’s. After that, when buying a new set I think it is not too much to ask of a seller how much 8 officers measure standing all together.

I know this isn't the real physical stuff, but we spend so much time playing and analysing online these days that the online board and pieces we choose are an important consideration. For me, I prefer the look of the "book" pieces, perhaps because they bring back many fond memories of looking at games and positions from books when I was a child (before the internet age). The other choice is the board, and for me I like "walnut", as it looks to me like a natural board you see in major tournaments, or even at the world championship match. To totally nerd out, I prefer the "coordinates" to be outside the board but am toying with the idea of turning them off as I rarely look at them. Interested to hear what others choose and their reasons why.

Just received a new set of pieces from House of Staunton and am pretty pleased. Morphy series 4 inch king. With apologies for the amateur pictures and less than ideal background. For better pics here is a link to cgrau's and goodnightmike’s excellent pictures of the same set albeit 4.4 inch king: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-equipment/house-of-stauntons-morphy-set?page=2 Talking about size this is I think for a 4 inch king set this is on the hefty side and definitely needs a 2.375 inch square board. The set takes for example more space than my 4.4’ king 1849 set, and is dwarfing my Marshall 4’ set. The 4.4’ of this Morphy set must feel like significant tools! Also interesting is the difference in rooks for the 4’ and 4’4 inch sets. The rooks on cgrau’s pics are, as he also mentioned, tall. In fact slightly taller than a knight. The 4’ set rook is of a different (more conservative/classical?) cut and slightly shorter than the knight. As most here will no doubt know, but just for the record; the title Morphy has nothing to do with the Jaques-Morphy design. This is a design from HoS from already quite a while ago. And a very well done and proportioned design it is imho. As I discover every time after opening a box of a newly arrived set: the real thing is so much better than online pictures and a very pleasant surprise at that. In case you contemplate buying make sure what you will get. On the site’s page the white pieces are altogether wrong and I couldn’t identify them. https://www.houseofstaunton.com/the-morphy-series-luxury-chess-pieces-4-0-king.html The smudge on the knight’s base looks awful on the picture, in real it’s hardly noticable. Also a succesful experiment was the stripping and new shellac finish of the box. Got a damaged box so with the hinges repair came also a new look. I do not really understand that thick red goo on the standard boxes that make everything look like plastic. Under that is some nicely grained wood (veneer, but still nice) that I like to see.

I just received this lovely little set and thought to post few photos here. King stands 3 1/4” tall, so it’s much smaller set than what I have gotten used to but it feels good to play. Also the quality of the pieces is amazing...to me it seems even better than my club size Jaques “Marshal style” set from early 20th century. (I know that the clock is not age appropriate...but I just like its tone. I will also shortly have something bit closer to the early 20th century coming) My 2.25” board is slightly too big for these pawns The Xylonite knights are really the highlights of this set in my opinion I also love that the bishops are different from Jaques sets ...as are the rooks I was very happy to get the set with its original box

Recent favourites: HoS 3.5 inch Anderssen circa 1856 ebony boxwood