Thoughts?
I personally appreciate h more due to its relative complexity. Although the more simple-minded may appreciate H's symmetry, as a more complex character, the randomness and ununiform nature of h gives it more character and life, in a way.
Additionally, the formality of H creates a boring, grey character. Notice my formal tone and use of uppercase and lowercase in my argument. This is not how anybody would type in texts and casual conversations. Formality is boring, and no matter how great and powerful the letter H or h is, you cannot change that. In fact, you may even be feeling bored while reading my carefully constructed argument. This is what formality does to an argument, and H is no different.
Uppercase letters are much more inconvenient to both write AND type. H takes 3 strokes of the pen to write, while h only takes 1. If you are typing, Unless you have autocorrect enabled, You will have to use either Caps-Lock or Shift to type an H, while h only takes 1 key to type. If you are a user of cursive or joined-up handwriting, H carries around even more inconvenience, because after the initial 3 strokes to form the H, one must use another to start another letter, while h can be linked easily to the rest of the word.
Another reason h is superior to H is the fact that, when patterned, using the form of what is commonly known on the internet as spam, H becomes monotonous and the repetitiveness and complexity begins to give a sense of meaningless brain hurt, while h remains interesting throughout. Let's say I go into the club description and change it to all H as a social experiment. Would anybody object? Let's see.
Note:
I intend for this post to be a meaningful debate and discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of H and h. Please stay civil in this forum.
Scoreboard:
H:0
h:3