thats not sonic buddy
I beat sonic fox bot (1750) without hints (i'm a 500) did i do good?

The enemy bot blundered its queen on move 7 (unlikely for a 1750 bot), but yeah you did well converting it to a win.

How on earth did a 1750 bot play so terribly?
I didn't expect that either. Normally I practice with 1100-1500 bots which is my skill lvl, and win around 60% of my games. I did not expect a 1750 to blunder so the game got even easier.

The enemy bot blundered its queen on move 7 (unlikely for a 1750 bot), but yeah you did well converting it to a win.
👏 thank you thank you 😊

I'm not even going to look at the game. Anytime 500 can take on 1750 is good. Even if it started the game without a queen.
I play so fast against the bots that I don't need a timer(obviously my thoughts on one of the comments I saw here)

I play so fast against the bots that I don't need a timer(obviously my thoughts on one of the comments I saw here)
But does he?

I'm not even going to look at the game. Anytime 500 can take on 1750 is good. Even if it started the game without a queen.
I play so fast against the bots that I don't need a timer(obviously my thoughts on one of the comments I saw here)
The point of the timer is usually to try to time the bot out because they think more than we do most of the time, that's how a lot of people beat the incredibly good bots.

I'm not even going to look at the game. Anytime 500 can take on 1750 is good. Even if it started the game without a queen.
I play so fast against the bots that I don't need a timer(obviously my thoughts on one of the comments I saw here)
The point of the timer is usually to try to time the bot out because they think more than we do most of the time, that's how a lot of people beat the incredibly good bots.
Yeah i forgot that bots just think a lot
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/105275117?tab=review
87.9 accuracy lol