What's wrong with you guys? Teaming victim in 4 games in a row.

Do you see the same pattern recently? It is all about the blitz/bullet games.

Game 1:
1-st attempt
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1982869-22

2-nd attempt after I was rescued by the opposite player:
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1982869-32

Game 2:
Same guys as in games 1 and 3 though playing relatively fair.
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1982875

Game 3:
No fair player would play this move:
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1982887-45

The rest confirms the situation.

Game 4:
New guys, same ugly style:
Yellow plays a move that obviously intends a double queen mate
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1982919-22

Game 5:

Same double queen attack:

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1983384-23

Idk where you are talking about, it looks like you are overrated at 1640.

That is perfectly reasonable ffa chess tactics.  You need to be looking for those.

Game1:

Why in earth did you give your B for the N on move4?  6Bc6 ugly mistake 6Bd7 prevents the mate and saved your B. 9d10 very bad 9 Nc9 to prevent the mate is much better.

Game2:

Why give away your B on move 6? Why take the pawn from your opposite on move 8?

Game3:

Your opposite maade an ugly mistake(3i12) after that you decide to sac your B on move 5 which is a very bad move. And yes they cooperate together but thats one of the strategies in FFA( if opposite dies first you lose in general).

Game4:

This is just a basic mate. You should change your playstyle to avoid these mates.

Game5:

6i11 very stupid move, you could prevent the mate with 6 Nl6.

All above mentioned games are 1m + 1s increment. My 1m+15d has nothing to do with the speed games there.

I expected that someone who has a regular FFA rating of 1640 understand the basics even though it is bullet.

Game 1 - speculating that the next player would premove (as it actually happened). 6BC6 is not an ugly mistake since I don't consider red and yellow as a team at that moment. Move 9 is a mistake but I thought that red and yellow gave up teaming.

Game 2 - pure mistake
Game 3 - not well thought but still an interesting challenge for blue - save the bishop or save the rook. Still, there is nothing like the blue queen move!

Game 4 - basic or not, this is a FFA. The obviously played a team strategy here which I could not prevent. The yellow queen on this square is (normally) a pure gift for red.

Game 5 - maybe it is, but i NEVER play in Teams mode so my expectations don't include such moves.

Game1: 

6Bc6 is for sure an ugly mistake because you Always have to look at possibilities of teaming(And you must know that yellow is a team player, that i am a team player, that some player is a traitor and so on. 

Im happy that you admit that move 9 is a mistake, it is a bigger mistake to think that someone gives up teaming if they have tried it before in the game( or in previous games).

Game2:

I hope that you mean 8Bxg7, yes that was worser then giving away your B.

Game3:

Maybe not but blue checked yellow( on move 11) to let him lose his B, so you can expect teaming.

Game4:

Maybe it is a "free" gift but by taking the q the winning chance decrease dramatically.

Game5:

Maybe you should play in teammode as well to learn these kind of mates.

If you want more tips then unblock me.

Admins: clearly explain what teaming is considered in FFA

4pc players: hElP sOmE pEoPlE tEaMeD oN mE

Dont think teaming its a opposite strategy but in 2nd game i am your opposite player and i am trying  my best to protact you.but you cannot coordinate with me.

I don't remember seeing you doing any unfair moves. I think you are a great player!

Ocf

XD