Yaz is certainly the class act of the bunch but the powers that be are desperate to increase viewership. Maurice is going the ESPN commentator route and Jen shows a little skin. It's all good as far as I'm concerned; I'm just happy there's coverage.
Sinquefield Commentator

Ashley is nothing but an engine slave, I can look his stuff up all by myself. I wonder if he switched off his chess brain for good.

It killed me yesterday when Yassar was answering a question about Korochnoi's current health. He was being thoughtful in taking time to answer the question in a compassionate way and then Maurice stupidly bursts in about a nothing move in a game that had been heading for a for an hour. Maurice is just too much, settle down man, if we want an engine eval we can get one.
Five or more hours of free (!!) chess coverage and commentary and we have problems with personalities, voice inflection, etc. What a joke! Not everyone watching the free (!!) coverage is rated 2000 nor do they all own an engine.
Personally, I think the team is great. And if our game is ever to stand on its own and not be dependent on the largesse of individuals, it'll have to target a viewing audience larger than the self-described nerds.

Well, the tournament is Americana, so you can't do it without the hollywood thing - Shad and Ashley.
If I were Jennifer Shahade I would see a speech therapist to get rid of that affected valley girl thing. Nothing makes an intelligent person sound stupid faster than talking like a valley guy/girl.

I appreciate the higher production values of the Sinquefield Cup broadcasts...but yes, Maurice Ashley is not the guy I would ever choose, especially for the interviews. Go back to hawking Millionaire Chess and making a spectacle of the world's most revered game ;)...
Jennifer is annoying at times with her ADHD focus issues (stop reading Twitter! Get an assistant to feed you that stuff...) and her penchant for dragging Yasser into low-brow observations/humor. Even worse when she won't let him tell his stories that are actually interesting. Better insight to hear a Yasser story about a tourney with a similar situation/game than get yet another "the engines say that Carlsen has given up .25 pawns...and in this [insert line with moves no human would ever find] line, he has a clear advantage..." update from Ashley. Giri's girlfriend or the indian WGM who did the WCC broadcasts are better.
Yasser is good. It is actually irritating when he gets interrupted as if he is "drifting" away from the more sensationalized aspects of the broadcasts.

Yasser and his anecdotes are really great. Jen's and Alejandro's styles are, surely, a matter of taste. And Maurice's job as an engine operator is a bit degrading, after all he is a GM. But I think overall the team did a good job.
I have, certainly, seen worse teams. For example, I was quite disappointed by Sopiko and Svidler. And this Har-Zvi guy on ICC is really annoying.
In contrast, I found Evgeni Miroshnichenko + Anna Burtasova surprisingly eloquent.

Nice to read I wasn't the only one getting slightly annoyed with Jennifer. Now Yasser I always enjoy, last time in Wijk aan Zee I found him very good too.

I think that I may have found a new torture device.....
...make your victim listen to Jennifer Shahade's voice.

You are too ungrateful. Maurice Ashley's commentary is nice. He's more or less SUPPOSED to use the computers, but he also gives great background on the players, etc.
Shahade is ok. Yasser is great.

Yaz, Svidler, Paco Vallejo, Jan, are my favorite commentators.
Irina Krush is my favorite female commentator.
Someone referred to "Jen's odd behaviour". That may be attributable to her having to simultaneously speak to Yasser & Maurice while listening to a director/producer via an earphone.
Anyone remember Shelby Lyman and the bell that prompted him to announce, "We have a move"?

I remember Shelby and the 72 match--was that a different format! And Shelby now lives here in upstate New York; I met him in a cafe in Binghamton a couple of years back.
As far as the broadcasters go, I guess I'm in the minority as I do not like Yasser's voice--his comments are good, but that all-too-soothing accent reminds me of some creepy uncles I have met in my time. Maurice is OK, but I'm from NYC, too, and I guess I expect commentaters to sound like that--enthusiastic, passionate. But I thought Maurice was at his best during the Kasparov-Anand match, teamed up with Danny King--that was the best pair I've ever seen. Jen's voice can be annoying, but it's the cross-talk that's choppy, not smooth, that's more annoying. I could forgive both their voices if they had better chemistry. I have the same complaint with the Millionaire coverage--strong players, but weak studio skills. The whole team there has it all except for two things--their tosses are not smooth and they tend to fixate on one or two games and ignore the rest of the field. Sometimes, like with Aronian-So or So-Nakamura, it can't be helped, but they tend to do this every round, and I normally open chessbomb in order to see the other games being played. The production team is excellent--those people have some chops. It's too bad the talent isn't at the same level.
I'm a bit of a chess nerd (as I suppose we all are) and really enjoy watching live commentary of some of the bigger tournaments such as the current Sinquefield Cup. Unfortunately my enthusiasm is somewhat dampened by the commentary team they have put together for the broadcast. I love Yasser but Jennifer Shahade, Maurice Ashley, and Alejandro Ramirez all rub me the wrong way, for different reasons. Nothing against them really, they're all much stronger chess players than I am, but their commentary styles are in some way grating for me. I know I'm being very picky, but I find it borderline unpleasant to listen to the commentary if Yasser, Jan Gustafsson, Peter Svidler, Daniel King, Erwin L'Ami, etc... aren't the main people involved. Does anyone else agree with me on this? What are your thoughts on what makes a good commentator and who the best ones are?