grandmaster repertoire

Sort:
KINGDASHER

For Sure I agree again with you. But you must also get the person you are playing against to agree to it also.

Many players have other thinks to do so I do not think this would work??? Good idea.

yusuf_prasojo
pepsifreyja wrote:

If it was done to me having a King and pawn and the other player just having a King I have a good idea how to play out this for a win by getting the pawn to the back rank if I am in a positioned on the right squares by keeping the pawn behind the King and forcing his King up the board.


I doubt you will have such a chance often. A pawn doesn't mean anything. Even in master level, a pawn often cannot substitute initiative and development.

At your level, don't play for such a small pawn advantage (don't be a pawn grabber). Try to master playing for activity/development/initiative/attacking chance.

KINGDASHER

Thanks

KINGDASHER

I suppose we have to see the funny side of thinks too??

 

“How many people at a chess tournament does it take to change a lightbulb ?

HAVE YOU GOT IT::

 

 

 

One to complain about the lighting levels,
one to say he thinks the lighting is OK,
one to suggest someone calls the arbiter,
one to go and call the arbiter,
one to reminisce about lighting levels at the 1947 tournament at Hastings,
one to complain about the disturbance the others are causing,
both arbiters, and
one to say he thought the lighting was better before they changed the lightbulb.”



“Nine.