Horn & McCrillis, Est. 1846, No. C-450, Made in U.S.A.

Sort:
cgrau

Here is another vintage set made in the U.S., the Horn McCrillis No. C-450. Like Drueke, Horn was driven out of the business of manufacturing wood sets in the U.S. by Lardy. This set sports a king of 3.25 inches. It's nicely carved and finished. It's well-proportioned and weighted. Unlike the Drueke set I recently posted, I easily would enjoy playing with this one.

cgrau

The kings have unique crowns and collars.

cgrau

As do the queens...

cgrau

The bishops carry through these design elements...

cgrau

The knights are simple, yet gracefully shaped and cleanly carved...

cgrau

The rooks are well proportioned both in height and in heft. No mistaking these rooks for pawns.

chessspy1

Very nice, never seen one of this pattern but I have seen Horn made sets before.

cgrau

The pawns are rugged and stable.

cgrau
AlanDewey wrote:

Very nice, never seen one of this pattern but I have seen Horn made sets before.

Thank you, Alan. I've seen simpler, cruder Horn patterns. I find this one quite pleasing. The pieces feel good in the hand, too.

cgrau

Here's an example of what I'm talking about when I say a simpler, cruder design. This is a Horn A-2 set with a 2.75" king. 

chessspy1

Yes, not a lot of time spent on carving the knights

UpcountryRain

I occasionally see the A-2 set but never give a second look. That C-150, on the other hand, is quite nice. Is that a recent find? I've been taking a liking to the smaller sets which I use on my Drueke 1.75". Anyway, this Horn & McCrillis is another interesting example of how the American chessmakers were attempting to stay within the Staunton pattern while producing something distinct and unique. I find this a lot more attractive than the Drueke recently posted. Do you have an idea as to when this set was produced?

cgrau

Up, I am told it's from the 1950's. I don't have a catalog, but that seems about right. Also, I think I misread the box, and it's a C-450 set. I agree, I find this a more pleasing design than the Drueke I recently posted. On the other hand, the Drueke is likely early 20th century, and by the looks of it aimed at a lower market niche. I have another Drueke coming in that I expect to be more comparable to this Horn set.

Noswals

Chuck, very interesting pattern. The size is also very acceptable for play. I like this one.

Ronbo710

That's a Beautiful Set !! But isn't that "C-450" instead of "C-150" in the pic? Just thought it might help in research Smile

cgrau
Ronbo710 wrote:

That's a Beautiful Set !! But isn't that "C-450" instead of "C-150" in the pic? Just thought it might help in research 

It is, as I noted above. Thanks, Ronbo. Good catch.

canigetanencore

I recently came across (and purchased!) a Horn c-550. I can't find any record of that model existing on the internet but it looks very close to the c-450 and c-750. Will post pictures in the AM!

liml
Beautiful
canigetanencore

Here are some pictures of my Horn C-550 Chess set. I can't find too much information about it on the internet save for the other posts here on chess.com. But, it's a lovely set for sure! Nice weight, interesting but solid design. Apparently it seems to be from the mid- 1930's according to one resource I found, but that's just a guess. 
Enjoy!

nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull

Here's an ad from March 1935 Chess Review: 
(resource: https://www.scribd.com/document/62620988/Usa-Chess-Sets)
null

frannyfran

Does anyone out there have one of these sets to sell? I would love to own these pieces! If so, please message me. Thank you!