I've had my eye on the HOS Reykjavik II set forever as an expensive, "someday," set. The deep crenelations on the rooks and other details make it distinctive, without drawing attention to themselves. It's one of their more popular sets, so you'd have a ton of options in terms of wood and wether you'd want a 3.75 or 4" king. The board you get would depend on the wood.
I'm not the biggest fan of HOS boards either. Mainly because, on the lower end, I don't like that HOS logo on h1.
I also kind of like the Zagreb '59 set. But I go back and forth on that one.
Realized after I typed this that I may not have answered your question. So, get them separate and then match the board to the pieces.
BTW: There are a fair number of video reviews of HOS sets on YouTube if you want some more in-depth looks at some of their sets.
Hi:
Some time ago I asked for recommendations for chess sets. People recommended House of Staunton so I looked at their sets and made up my mind I would like to get one from them. I am wondering what other people prefer…
I originally thought a all in one box set would be nice, now I am thinking of buying the board and chessmen separately. I have a budget of around 200-250$. Can anyone give me their opinion in what type of set they prefer (box or board separate, etc.)? I am sort of leaning towards a separate board because they look heavier/thicker…
Is there a quality difference? I understand the sets are cheaper typically. If someone can recommend a board and or a set from House of Staunton I would appreciate it….I have NO IDEA what I am buying!
Best!
Mike