I made an electronic chessboard (actually several) and I want to make a video demo of it. The board supports natural movements like the DGT eboard but uses cheap plastic chessmen.
The goal of my board is for USCF OTB tournament use (record PGN and live broadcast), so I did not work on online chess interface.
Below is my demo plan:
(demonstrate different movement methods slide/pickup/change mind while maintaining touch)
1. d4 e5
2. d5 e4
(demonstrate knockover by knocking over the board and resetting to prior position)
(demonstrate different capturing methods)
3. f4 exf3ep (move, capture)
4. Qd4 c5
5. dxc6ep (remove both, place) Ne7
6. Qxg7 (move adjacent, remove) Bxg7 (capture, move)
(demonstrate promotion)
7. cxb7 fxg2
8. bxc8=Q fxh1=Q->N
9. Qxb8 Ng3 (note promotion change)
(demonstrate castling)
10. Nc3 OO (king first)
11. Be3 Rxb8
12. OOO (rook first)
(explain illegal moves are allowed unless players notice)
(demonstrate auto illegal move undo)
13. Nxe2+ (Rxd7, this is illegal, black points out check and white undo) Bxe2
I think the above covers most of the features of the board in the least amount of moves. I welcome your suggestions.
Thanks in advance!
a) Totally agree, it's a disgrace. Thick, clumsy and inelegant pieces, while the pawns are too small and too light. This is pure speculation, but could it be that they're using a cheap species of wood which quickly would start bending were they to be made to more slender specifications? Having seen this happening a lot with inexpensive versions of Ronbo710's favourite, the Chavet, it wouldn't surprise me at all if this was the case.
b) Which makes it even worse ...
c) The DGT 2010 is way better than the older model (which emitted an almighty and loud thwack/clack), but I totally agree. It's not rocket science, and other makers have managed to eliminate it.
d) I have to confess that this has never been much of an issue for me.
e) Isn't this a bit like computer software and hardware in general? While there undoubtedly once was an enormous development cost, most new versions are just minor tweaks of the previous one.
DGT is great for tournament organizers, because they save loads of time inputting games. That's another reason why it's so odd why no one has come up with a low cost version ...