Battle,
I have a solid bloodwood and maple chess board that looks pretty nice.
It's dense, with a specific gravity of 1.01, which means it's heavier than water. Freshly cut, it has a reddish hue, which will darken over time like red sandalwood and padauk. Apparently, it isn't difficult to turn or carve, as the picture below shows.
Because the wood is native to South America and not Asia is probably why we don't see it being used in chess sets manufactured in India, where it's cheaper to use the local hardwoods.
I haven't visited this topic in ages.
I was told that South American Bloodwood is not a good crimson wood to substitute for red sandalwood in the "Blood Rosewood" trademark. I get that the wood is dense, but why isn't it a good substitute? Don't get me wrong, Padauk glows in sunset-Orange and red-orange, but Bloodwood is pitch crimson!