"... In order to maximize the benefits of [theory and practice], these two should be approached in a balanced manner. ... Play as many slow games (60 5 or preferably slower) as possible, ... The other side of improvement is theory. ... This can be reading books, taking lessons, watching videos, doing problems on software, etc. ..." - NM Dan Heisman (2002)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627084053/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman19.pdf
"... If it’s instruction, you look for an author that addresses players at your level (buying something that’s too advanced won’t help you at all). This means that a classic book that is revered by many people might not be useful for you. ..." - IM Jeremy Silman (2015)
https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-best-chess-books-ever
Here are some reading possibilities that I often mention:
Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Simple-Attacking-Plans-77p3731.htm
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1948)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-back-to-basics-tactics
Discovering Chess Openings by GM John Emms (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/catalog/excerpts/openings_amateurs.pdf
Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Chess_Endgames_for_Kids.pdf
A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Studying Chess Made Easy by Andrew Soltis (2009)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090448/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review750.pdf
Seirawan stuff:
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf
Silman's "The Amateur's Mind"

I am planing since long to make such a list, but I didn’t yet. It is somehow difficult for me to go through a game I lost and review it carefully.



I have been going through this book recently. I have also read some of "Reaccess Your Chess".
I was chiming in on the ever popular "Secret of Chess" thread, and it suddenly struck me. "The Amateur's Mind" is all about how difficult it is for amateurs to actually implement Silman's system of imbalances. Now this doesn't mean I haven't learned anything from the book. And it doesn't mean I'll stop going through it. But I do have to wonder if there isn't a more accessible way of learning what he is trying to convey.
I'm not afraid of hard work. I'm going through Yusupov. And I have to admit, I cannot think of a way to further simplify what Silman is trying to convey. Nor can I think of another book that does a better job of it.
But does Chess REALLY have to be this hard to grasp? Perhaps the answer is yes. Perhaps the answer is no one has really found the ideal way to teach it yet.
K.I.S.S
Keep It Simple Stupid. And no its not a personal attack on you :-)
When we all started to learn the game, we all pretty much improved the same way.
We fell for the 2, and 4 move mate. Then we learned how to prevent it.
Then we just got quickly mated, and learned how to avoind that.
Then we lost because of blunders, and learn how to limit them.
Our blunders became smaller, and smaller until out losses were more do to 1-2 move tactics.
We then learned how to not fall for simple tactics, and then the even smaller stuff like longer tactics started to kill us.
We grown beyond them (somewhat) and then begin to not understand strategy.
Learn from your mistakes, try not to repeat them, and grow from them.
We are human, and will always make mistakes. All we can do is try to make our mistakes as small as possible.
I have been going through this book recently. I have also read some of "Reaccess Your Chess".
I was chiming in on the ever popular "Secret of Chess" thread, and it suddenly struck me. "The Amateur's Mind" is all about how difficult it is for amateurs to actually implement Silman's system of imbalances. Now this doesn't mean I haven't learned anything from the book. And it doesn't mean I'll stop going through it. But I do have to wonder if there isn't a more accessible way of learning what he is trying to convey.
I'm not afraid of hard work. I'm going through Yusupov. And I have to admit, I cannot think of a way to further simplify what Silman is trying to convey. Nor can I think of another book that does a better job of it.
But does Chess REALLY have to be this hard to grasp? Perhaps the answer is yes. Perhaps the answer is no one has really found the ideal way to teach it yet.