You are missing something. When I looked this up in my copy of The Amateur's Mind, the sequence mentioned is
6. ... d5 7. Nc3 Nf6 8. cxd5 Nxd5 ...
I'm not sure if you're just skipping past those moves while reading (I know I do that sometimes) or if your copy has a misprint, but you're missing a whole move there.
On page 87 of his great book "The Amateur's Mind" (2. edition) Silman goes over a master game between Fischer and Gheorghiu with one of his student. The moves are
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Nxe5 d6
4. Nf3 Nxe4
5. d4 Be7
I checked them, these are indeed the moves played in that game. However, the student proposes 6. c4 along with the follow-up 6. ... d5 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Bc4 Be6 9. Nc3. Which knight of black's is supposed to take on d5? The only piece that can take on d5 is black's queen, but than the next move 8. Bc4 would not make sense. Later on he even repeats that seqence and comments on it's value (not mentioning of course that it is impossible anyway). Am I missing something or should I just ignore that passage?