this is odd (USCF is inconsistant on advice on board size

Sort:
catnapper
Warbler wrote:

I don't like the idea of messing with peoples minds.   When I play someone, I want their A game.   It should be about chess, not psyching the other player out.


There is a difference between someone who plays in tournaments and a tournament player. When it comes to tournaments I want only one thing, to win. I could care less if it's because he blunders or receives word his mum just died.

Okay, story time again! I played at an American Open when I was a teen. First round I was paired with a Susan Mills. Fifteen moves into the game I had a winning position. So I took my eyes off the game and to her bra-less T-shirt. After eyeballing her chest for a bit, I noticed her hands, which were very masculine. Then I gave attention to her face, which had masculine features as well. While pondering all this rather than the game I soon blundered away my advantage and lost the game. When I gave the humiliating report to my friends that I had lost to a girl, not only was I laughed at, but was told she used to be Gary Mills. But it wasn't all bad, I won all the rest of my games and took first in my class.

Warbler
catnapper wrote:
Warbler wrote:

I don't like the idea of messing with peoples minds.   When I play someone, I want their A game.   It should be about chess, not psyching the other player out.


There is a difference between someone who plays in tournaments and a tournament player. When it comes to tournaments I want only one thing, to win. I could care less if it's because he blunders or receives word his mum just died.


no, its a difference of moral character, especially  if you care less that your oppenent's mother just died.  

AndyClifton

Yeah, jeez catnapper, whadja go and get all amoral for anyway?

catnapper
Warbler wrote:
catnapper wrote:

There is a difference between someone who plays in tournaments and a tournament player. When it comes to tournaments I want only one thing, to win. I could care less if it's because he blunders or receives word his mum just died.

no, its a difference of moral character, especially  if you care less that your oppenent's mother just die.  


Context please. I didn't say I could care less that someone's mum died, I said I couldn't care less if I win a tournament game because someone receives word their mum died. Yeah I'd feel sorry for the person, but be glad I got a point in the win column.

catnapper
AndyClifton wrote:

Yeah, jeez catnapper, whadja go and get all amoral for anyway?


Okay, story time! There's a great surf break between TJ and Ensenada. The owners had a campground there which had a large hand painted sign at the entrance. It read "No drinking, fighting, (a host of other things, can't recall them all), or other inmoral acts."

Warbler

*sigh*

KalunaDarlin

To wander back to the original question...I prefer the 2nd of the two pictured boards.  Just esthetics matter to me for home play.  I like the look of the slightly crowded board.  But I don't play blitz either.  :)

NimzoRoy

What's the rule for matching this set to the proper board size? I guess all 4 legs have to fit in the square right?

Fugazy_Crapov

Re. the 4 inch collector, it looks great on 2.375 inch squares or a little larger but cramped on a 2.25 inch board. HOS never recommended 2.25 inch squares for the set on their website.

Warbler

HOS also recommends 2.25 inch squares to 2.375 inch squares. 

http://www.houseofstaunton.com/product_p/mencol40.htm

goldendog

Yet for the 4" Capablanca set they recommend a minimum of 2.375" squares.

http://www.houseofstaunton.com/product_p/menwcap40.htm

Sounds like someone made an error in the recommended board size for that Collector.

It all depends on what you're used to as the standard. I think these are Pioneer Club equipment. How many of those pawns can you fit in one square?

catnapper
goldendog wrote:

It all depends on what you're used to as the standard. I think these are Pioneer Club equipment. How many of those pawns can you fit in one square?

 


I suspect those pawns were using performance enhancing drugs...

Warbler
goldendog wrote:

Yet for the 4" Capablanca set they recommend a minimum of 2.375" squares.

http://www.houseofstaunton.com/product_p/menwcap40.htm

Sounds like someone made an error in the recommended board size for that Collector.

 


hmm, strange.    perhaps they did make an error.