Which cheap set - World Chess Academy or Best Chess Set Ever?

Sort:
davidabrey

I’m looking at getting a basic set, and have narrowed it down to two main options, the World Chess Academy set and the Best Chess Set Ever. I don’t have a lot of room to leave a full size set left out permanently, so these two look good due to the foldable / rollable boards, but they are still reasonably sized.

How do the two sets compare? Is there any reason to favour one over the other? I live in the UK, and it seems both should be reasonably available here, so I’d prefer not to import as I don’t want to spend too much on a simple set.

Thanks.

MrPrimeChess

Questions to consider:

 

Does one set have wooden pieces? Which one is more expensive? Did you check the reviews? What is the rating? Does it have an instructions manual?

davidabrey

Both sets are plastic pieces, the world chess has a folding cardboard board, the Best Set Ever has a rollable one that is slightly larger. Prices are similar (£30-40). I’ve read a review on here of the World Chess set, which was very positive. There’s a review on here of plastic pieces that includes those from both sets, but it only lists the sizes etc, there wasn’t anything qualitative.

MrPrimeChess

Which one has more pieces? Like it could come with 32 (16 white 16 black) or 64 (32 white, 32 black)

GrandPatzerDave-taken

The Best Chess Set Ever is available in two sizes/weights: "triple" and "quad".  Are you looking at the triple or the quad ("XL")?

I have an Academy set and the BCSE XL.  I like both for different reasons but the XL set is massive and very heavy.  I'm not a fan of the triple-weighted set's knight but that's just me.

Maybe a deciding factor is if you want a more modern or classical Staunton look?

MrPrimeChess

I think it's good to have triple because you get backup pieces in case something goes missing.

binomine
GrandPatzerDave wrote:

Maybe a deciding factor is if you want a more modern or classical Staunton look?

This is pretty much it. Both chess sets are functionally identical, so it would come down to personal taste. 

MrPrimeChess
binomine wrote:
GrandPatzerDave wrote:

Maybe a deciding factor is if you want a more modern or classical Staunton look?

This is pretty much it. Both chess sets are functionally identical, so it would come down to personal taste. 

thumbup.png

GrandPatzerDave-taken
MrPrimeChess wrote:

I think it's good to have triple because you get backup pieces in case something goes missing.

I'm not completely sure I understand this but I believe both the Academy and the XL sets come with extra queens.

One additional topic I thought of after I first posted was the boards - compare the folding cardboard of the Academy set with the BCSE's silicone board.  Personally I abhor silicone boards because of the stickiness but again, that's just me.  They certainly handle spills better than cardboard or mousepad.  Of course you can always seek out a better board for either set.

jjupiter6

I love my World chess set. The peices themselves are excellent but the board isn't going to last with repeated folding and unfolding.

antonius67

@digitaldave71. Have a look at House of Staunton. They have a 20% off promotion right now and have a range of great plastic pieces at various price points, sizes and weights, along with roll-up vinyl boards for a decent price. (I have the Collectors, Marshall, Hastings and Fischer plastic pieces and all are decent). You'll pay a bit for shipping, but this is offset somewhat by the lower US cost of the product. Also, with the 5 orders I've made with them, I've never incurred any customs, handling or tax charges. (I'm in the UK too). You could possibly pick up a set for the same overall cost as the ones you mention above.

EnigmaMachine1
Hi digital Dave - maybe a third option to consider - a DGT starter set? Similar package to the other two and can be had in the UK for much cheaper - although it only includes single queens

https://digitalgametechnology.com/products/non-electronic-chess/dgt-chess-starter-box-grey

I’ve been using this with my kids for the last couple of years and it has held up very well.

I think all of you options are high quality and any would be a good choice 👍
MrPrimeChess

I think you should get the one that is bigger (the rollable one.)

zbieraj

I don't recommend the DGT plastic set. It has a terrible design and horrible ergonomics. BCSE has extra weight and also size configurations. Of course, I would highly recommend the Academy Set:

Review - World Chess Official Academy Chess Set

davidabrey

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I will be ordering the World Chess Academy Set based on the slightly smaller size for the space where I can set up, the fact that the board will fold up rather than roll up for storage. As for the appearance, I’m not that bothered, until recently I didn’t even know what a Staunton set was!

MrPrimeChess

Get the bigger one.

AnthonyPDC
zbieraj wrote:

I don't recommend the DGT plastic set. It has a terrible design and horrible ergonomics. BCSE has extra weight and also size configurations. Of course, I would highly recommend the Academy Set:

Review - World Chess Official Academy Chess Set

There's something rather artless - even Stalinist in its hostility to tradition and history - about the ugly and heavily-promoted "World Chess Academy" set. First, there is no "World Chess Academy": it is cynical marketing fiction. Second, the claims made by the designer, Daniel Weil (an architect), such as invoking the pediment of the Parthenon are similarly sketchy. All classic Staunton pieces from the C19 reflect the profile of the Parthenon's pediment merely on the basis of descending piece heights from king to pawn on a sloping line of classical proportion. Nothing remotely special or unique about that. Granted, there may be tactile advantages of this design in speed chess, but I can't help feeling this entire thing was driven by the usual suspects: the money men. One wonders how much money changed hands for FIDE to adopt it. Horrible set.