Anti Nimzo Indian

Sort:
Anonymous_Dragon

So guys for a long time I have been finding ways to effectively respond to 1.d4 as black. I have tried out my hands on many ....the classical D5 , Queens Gambit declined , Slav , Kings Indian , Grunefeld ...... 

But recently I thought of learning the Nimzo Indian. And in my opinion that's the most comfortable...at least for me. So I decided to play it out ....and on my very first game where I tried to play it ...my opponent went for something called the anti Nimzo Indian. I barely escaped from being crushed . 

It would be helpful if you could leave any suggestions. Is there a way I can still transpose it into the Nimzo Indian ? Or what am I supposed to do here..... What are the thematic plans in the anti variation ...

Anonymous_Dragon

Here's the game 

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/5857598347

1e4c6_O-1

I don't know any theory in the anti nimzo. sorry.

dah_happyh0ppyh0rsi3

i suck at chess too sad.png

Anonymous_Dragon
MISTER_McCHESS wrote:

I don't know any theory in the anti nimzo. sorry.

Np

Anonymous_Dragon
Dah_Happyhoppyhorsi3 wrote:

i suck at chess too

No u don't

dah_happyh0ppyh0rsi3

thanks happy.png

NikkiLikeChikki
https://youtu.be/wlDddtHl44E
Anonymous_Dragon
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:

Thanks ...but I was.looking for something more general. A video on  thematic idea and purpose of both the sides would be helpful. Or if you could share something from your own experience.

AthenaTheChessCub

I don't know, when playing vs d4 I prefer the grunfeild, sometimes the queens Indian, so idk any lines, srry 

Ali-808

For me Grunefeld defence is good against D5, it give Opponent a chance to control centre but at the same time a small mistake from Opponent will led to amazing queen side attack ...by keeping black king with support of bishop in back wink.png

blueemu

There's nothing wrong with the line you played, although Black usually exchanges exd5 earlier than you did.

Anonymous_Dragon
Ali-808 wrote:

For me Grunefeld defence is good against D5, it give Opponent a chance to control centre but at the same time a small mistake from Opponent will led to amazing queen side attack ...by keeping black king with support of bishop in back 

Yep I like the Grunefeld too. It's my second choice after the Nimzo. And yeah all the reasons you stated are correct....just that I feel most of its variations are sharp and double edged.

NikkiLikeChikki
@dragon. The pawn setup before the trap is very solid. It’s the general strategy to combat the anti-nimzo. It basically transposes into a sort of QG setup.
Anonymous_Dragon
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
@dragon. The pawn setup before the trap is very solid. It’s the general strategy to combat the anti-nimzo. It basically transposes into a sort of QG setup.

Thanks.

NikkiLikeChikki
You can also switch to a QID when they play the anti Nimzo.
Anonymous_Dragon
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
You can also switch to a QID when they play the anti Nimzo.

I dont know the QID

AthenaTheChessCub
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
You can also switch to a QID when they play the anti Nimzo.

I dont know the QID

It is good as black for defence, but not getting cornered and can still get a good attack later on, you should try it 

Laskersnephew

White very frequently plays 3.Nf3, often because he wants to avoid the Nimzo! You have a lot of choices here, so you just have to pick one. 3...b6 is called the Queens Indian, and it's quite sound. 3...Bb4+ is called the Bogo-Indian, and it's also sound. Or you can play 3...d5 and transpoe back into the Queens Gambit declined. Or you can play 3...c5, which is what you played in the game. This is the Benoni and it's also quite playable. You can't force White to allow the Nimzo with 3.Nc3, so you need a second opening

Mr_Vladdy

Yeap, I prefer to switch into 3...d5 and accept the catalan etc.