Caro Kann named variations tree with evaluation and 1600-2000 performance stats for reference

I stumbled on the great carokann wikipedia page that has all these named variations. the "easy to make a book out of this" info was so juicy, i decided to sort everything into an easy to navigate tree and add both stockfish evaluations, but more importantly, performance stats under 2000 to show just how good or bad all these variations PERFORM in the real world where parroting grandmaster talking points is actually wrong. look at those gambits! there's a couple really strong performing ones. i was surprised that the cave man is just = as it was beating almost every line by move 15 with a bunch of engines vs stockfish. computers and humans see different things. that's the other reason i like amateur theory... a lot of times, stockfish recommendations are losing over the board, but mostly because that's where i can get all the gambit and out of book theory i need to play "unsound" gambits that literally decimate (as in have +10% or more winning stats)

i hope this resource is handy in chosing repertoires. i still need something to play as i'm terrible against hypermoderns myself.

the numbers are percent wins with white first then black and + favors white and - black. 

1.e4 c6 Caro Kann  47:48@19.7mil +0.6

2.d4 48:47@8.9m +0.4

   2… d5 48:47@8.4m +0.4

      3.e5 Advance Variation 47:48@3.2m +0.5

         3… Bf5 48:48@2.3m +0.5

            4.Nf3 Short Variation 47:49@574k +0.5

            4.h4 Tal Variation aka Cave Man Attack 54:42@236k +0.5

            4.g4 Bayonet Variation 50:46@184k +0.5

            4.Nc3 Van der Wiel Attack 47:49@171k +0.5

               4… Qb6 Dreyev Defense 40:56@1512 +0.1

            4.Ne2 Bronstein Variation 52:44@58k+0.5

            4.b4 Prins Attack +0.1 at less than 16k games

         3…c5 Botvinnik–Carls Defense 44:52@601k +0.3

      3.exd5 cxd5 Exchange Variation 47:47@2.6m +0.3

         4.c4 Panov–Botvinnik 50:45@754k +0.3

            4…Nf6 5.Nc3 49:45@349k =

               5…Nc6 48:46@119k =

                  6.Bg5 Modern Defense  50:44@28k +0.1

                     6…e6 Carlsbad Line 50:44@13k =

                     6…Qa5 Czerniak Line 43:47@473 =

                     6…Qb6 Reifir–Spielmann Line 50:45@224 =

               5…e6 Panov–Botvinnik (with 5…e6) 49:45@114k =

         4.Bd3 Nc6 5.c3 Nf6 6.Bf4 Rubinstein Variation 52:42@80k +0.2

      3.Nc3 Two Knights Variation (without 3...Bg4) 50:45@1.8m +0.5

         3… dxe4 49:45@1.7m +0.3

            4.Nxe4 Main Line 49:46@1.6m +0.3

               4…Bf5 Classical Variation 50:44@946k +0.2

                  5.Ng3 Bg6 51:43@769k +0.2

                     6. h4 h6 7.Nf3 Nd7 Classical Variation (with 7...Nd7) 49:44@60k +0.2

                        8.h5 Bh7 9.Bd3 Bxd3 10.Qxd3 Spassky Variation 49:44@107k +0.5

                     6.Nh3 Flohr Variation 55:40@25k +0.3

               4…Nf6 Knight Variation 48:47@674k +0.2

                  5.Nxf6+ 47:47@413k +0.4

                     5…exf6 Tartakower-Korchnoi Variation 47:47@336k +0.5

                        6.Bc4 Forgacs Variation 47:47@39k +0.4

                     5… gxf6 Bronstein-Larsen Variation 48:47@76k +0.5 

                  5.Bd3 Tarrasch/Alekhine Gambit 49:46@31k +0.4

               4…Nd7 Steinitz-Karpov Variation 48:46@256K +0.2

                  5.Bc4 Ngf6 51:44@+0.2 +0.4

                     6.Ng5 e6 7.Qe2 Nb6 Smyslov Variation 55:41@13k =

                     6. Nxf6+ Nxf6 Tiviakov–Fischer Attack 46:47@2516 +0.4

                  5.Nf3 Ngf6 6.Ng3 Modern Variation Karpov Attack 48:46@38k +0.2

                  5.Ng5 Ndf6 Ivanchuk Defense 57:39@10k +0.1

               4…h6 Finnish Variation 50:44@6,864k +0.2

            4.f3 Milner–Barry Gambit, Rasa-Studier Gambit 54:42@111K +0.3

            4.Bc4 Von Hennig Gambit 54:42@25K +0.3

         3…g6 Gurgenidze System 50:46@37K +0.3

            4. e5 Bg7 5.f4 h5 Gurgenidze Defense 45:51@3364 +0.9

         3…b5 Gurgenidze Counter Attack 44:51@8.6k +0.3

      3.Nd2 Modern Variation 51:44@373k +0.5

         3…g6 New Caro–Kann 52:43@7859 +0.2

         3…Qb6 Edinburgh Variation 52:44@1k +0.2

      3.f3 Maroczy Variation aka (?) Fantasy/Lilienfisch Variation 53:43@259k +0.5

         3…dxe4 4.fxe4 e5 5.Nf3 exd4 6.Bc4 Maroczy Gambit 61:35@22k +0.8

         3…Nf6 Campomanes Attack 52:44@25k =

      3.Bd3 Nf6? 4.e5 Nfd7 6.e6 Landau Gambit 88%@279! +2.1

      3.c4 Diemer–Duhm Gambit 49:47@44k +0.5

      3.Nf3 dxe4 4.Ng5 Ulysses Gambit 46:51@54k -0.9

      3.Be3 Mieses Gambit 49:48@8.6k +0.5

   2… Nf6 Masi Variation 56:41@26k +0.9

   2…Na6? De Bruycker Defense +1.3 in less than 12k games

   2…f5? Massachusetts Defense +3.1 in less than 12k games

2.Nf3 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.Ne5 Apocalypse Attack 52:44@26k =

2.Nc3 d5 48:48@1.5m +0.3

   3.Nf3 Two Knights Attack 50:45@471k +0.3

      3…dxe4 4.Ng5 Hector Gambit 52:44@3,966 +0.3

      3…Bg4 Two Knights Variation (with 3...Bg4) 46:49@216k +0.3

   3.d3 dxe4 4.Bg5 Scorpion-Horus Gambit 54:43@1,234 -0.6

   3.Qf3 Spielmann/Goldman Variation 54:42@43k +0.2

2.Bc4 Hillbilly Attack 42:54@1m -0.5

2.d3 Breyer Variation 47:48@569k +0.1

2.c4 Accelerated Panov: English Variation Modern 50:45@485k =

the variations are sorted by amateur popularity and some lines have multiple names eg. most places don't recognize the cave man as a variation.

this info is so much easier to skim in times roman. sans serif fonts are harder to read