Do you play 2.exd5 following 1.e4 d5??



I don't know. I just thought the sky was falling or something, because I haven't seen a mainline Scandinavian played out (I'm talking about 1.e4 e5 2.exd5 Qxd5).
Glad to know that there are more sensible people out there =D.

Certainly, 2. exd5 is the most "independent" move from the point of view of distinguishing the Center Counter Defense from other openings. However, even though I never play it, I do not see any problem with 2. e5.
One "virtue" of this move is that it can transpose to openings that Black probably had no intention of playing (e.g., Advance Variation of the French Defense).


I used to take the pawn, but since I've started playing lots of gambits, I've switched to 2. d4 against the Scandinavean, transposing into the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit (1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. f3).
--Fromper




Gideon, the higher the level of your opponents, the more likely that they'll know the types of positions that result from the particular openings they play and be able to play those particular positions better than you. So you need to know enough about certain openings to steer it in your favor, or at least know what to expect. But at low and intermediate levels, if you just follow good general opening principles, most games will be determined by how well both players handle the middle and endgame phases.
I think the key if you're studying chess to improve is to just look at your recent losses, figure out where your biggest weaknesses are, and work on improving those. If you're not losing games because of poor opening play, then don't bother studying the openings yet. If you're not sure if you played an opening properly in of your games, maybe look it up in an opening encycopedia type book (like MCO or NCO) or a database of master games (like on chesslab.com) to see how masters would have played that position. You'll learn good opening moves a little bit at a time that way, and learn a little from those master games, without spending too much time on opening study when there are more important areas for you to work on.
--Fromper
Also known as the Scandinavian, 1...d5 is my favorite response as black. However, in every single "online chess" game I've played, not one person has taken it. I end up getting 2.Nf3 or 2.Nc3. What is going on here, I thought everyone liked to follow the mainline, which is potentially dangerous for black as black has to play carefully to avoid many traps.
I was curious as to how of you respond to
1.e4 d5. If you've never encountered this respone by black before to 1.e4, then now is a good time to think of how you would want to respond.