Keep trying different openings until you find the ones you enjoy playing
How do you find the best opening for you

I hate to be all negative and everything, but your ratings are so low that it doesn't matter. Your opponents at this level won't be able to follow your lead and you'll be "out of book" almost immediately. No, just develop according to principles and see if you can get a little better level of competition before worrying about openings. Oh, these Chess Mentor courses could really help you raise your ratings, and yes, three of the courses are on openings.
http://www.chess.com/blog/webmaster/free-chess-mentor-courses

(p. 119)
The two most common moves for starting a game are 1. e4 (which we
recommend for beginning and intermediate players) and 1. d4. Although
many top players have strong ideas about which of these moves is better
for them personally, relatively few have fixed opinions as to which of the
moves in stronger intrinsically.
The prevailing view is that 1. e4 and 1. d4 are for all practical purposes
of equal strength. In the whole of chess history there is no instance where
the loss of a game has been objectively traced back to someone having
played 1. e4 e5 or 1. d4 d5--or, for that matter, to several other possible
first moves by White and Black.
WHAT A DIFFERENCE A MOVE MAKES
Although the purpose behind 1. e4 and 1. d4 is about the same (to grab
the center with, if possible, an immediate 2. d4 or 2. e4), the play that later
develops from these two moves is quite dissimilar.
With 1. e4, White opens up the Queen on the d1-h5 diagonal and lib-
erates the King Bishop to go to c4, where it can attack f7 and, potentially,
the Black King. Games that develop from 1. e4 may proceed very quickly
to a conclusion. If Black, for example, plays inaccurately, he may lose in
(p. 120)
only a few moves. On the other hand, sometimes you can make several
poor moves in Queen pawn openings and still fight for a long time. (Of
course, against a strong opponent, you will lose just as certainly.)
A mistaken attitude among many beginning and intermediate players
is that holding on for a large number of mmoves is in itself a sign of
progress. Untrue. A player could lose in 25 moves as Black against 1. e4
and put up a stronger fight than someone who loses prosaically and sim-
ply in 60 moves as Black against 1. d4.
Bobby Fischer is certainly the greatest player among those who are
very strong advocates of 1. e4. "Best by test," he wrote in his My 60 Memo-
rable Games. In his career, Fischer used 1. e4 to produce straightforward
attacking and positional chess that brought him numerous speedy victo-
ries against even world championship level opponents.
The downside to 1. e4 is that it frequently brings a game to a crisis
point too early from White's viewpoint. Black finds the single defense that
permits a tradeoff of pieces, and a draw ensues. The advantage of 1. d4 is
that it puts off decisive action until more pieces enter the position actively,
thereby making accurate defense more intricate and difficult.
(p. 157)
CHAPTER
9
Subtle Queen
Pawn Openings
WHAT A DIFFERENCE A PAWN MOVE MAKES. The kind of game that
develops from 1. d4 or 1. e4 frequently differs dramatically. If the d-
pawn openings usually develop relatively slowly with decisive action
reserved for the middlegame, many e-pawn openings involve hand-to-
hand fighting directly in the opening--often in the first 10 moves or so.
When White begins with 1. e4, he immediately frees the way for his
King Bishop to go to c4, where it strikes at f7, a key square for attacking
the Black King. (Compare this kind of attack with 1. d4, which opens up
the Queen Bishop, which may then be moved to f4 [not c4] and which
then hits c7 rather than endangering the King by attacking f7.) In addi-
tion, speedy development of the Kingside pieces permits easy castling for
White, which brings the Rook into play. The end result can be a very quick
win for White against Black, if the second player makes a few weak moves.
Among non-masters, the e-pawn openings usually lead to quicker wins
(or losses) than the d-pawn debuts.
As for play at the higher levels, grandmasters prefer e- or d-pawn
openings largely as a matter of personal taste. Equally great players will
disagree as to whether 1. e4 or 1. d4 is the better move. Some world cham-
pions such as Bobby Fischer and Garry Kasparov have preferred 1. e4;
some titleholders such as Jose Capablanca and Mikhail Botvinnik have
played 1. d4 predominantly. But most masters, while holding definite
views as to whether 1. e4 or 1. d4 is the better move for their style and
temperament, do not have fixed views as to which move is intrinsically
superior.
The current thinking is that for all practical purposes, the moves are
of about equal strength. Choose the opening scheme that better suits your
approach to chess.
Alburt, Lev, and Larry Parr. 1997. Secrets of the Russian Chess Masters, Volume 2: Beyond the Basics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
I guess I want to experiment around more is there anything people would suggest to try.