You dont get your opponent to go along with what openings you play. You need to understand the pawn structure, piece placement, and endgame ideas of each opening. For now...I wouldnt get all caught up in openings per se. I would concentrate more on Opening principles for now.
Opening Principles:
1. Control the center squares – d4-e4-d5-e5
2. Develop your minor pieces toward the center – piece activity is the key
3. Castle
4. Connect your rooks
Tactics...tactics...tactics...
Pre Move Checklist:
1. Make sure all your pieces are safe.
2. Look for forcing move: Checks, captures, threats. You want to look at ALL forcing moves (even the bad ones) this will force you look at, and see the entire board.
3. If there are no forcing moves, you then want to remove any of your opponent’s pieces from your side of the board.
4. If your opponent doesn’t have any of his pieces on your side of the board, then you want to improve the position of your least active piece.
5. After each move by your opponent, ask yourself: "What is my opponent trying to do?"
As a new(ish) player, I've just started to study the game and have encountered what seems to be an ambiguity. I keep reading that I should pick an opening and play the heck out of it for a year to really absorb it. That, I understand. What I'm less clear on is how I get my opponents to go along with that.
Say I'm learning the Benko Gambit and want to play it as black. How do I know that white is going to play 2. c4 (which seems critical) after I play 1 .. Nf6? Isn't there like a ton of other things white could do that aren't c4?
I guess I'm wondering if both sides aren't just reacting to what the other player is doing while trying to follow sound opening principals and the opening is the one that most closely matches what they played rather than being something that one of the players decided on?
I apologize if this has been asked before; I didn't find a similar post via the search.
Thanks!