i Think i created a new gambit
Sort:
that's a variation of the Goring Gambit, which can also arise from a Danish Gambit move order, it's impossible to invent decent openings in 2021
ConfusedGhoul wrote:
that's a variation of the Goring Gambit, which can also arise from a Danish Gambit move order, it's impossible to invent decent openings in 2021
dang i thought i did something
I understand your hype but it's no longer possible to find new openings, now there is only room for creativity in novelties in already estabilished openings
ConfusedGhoul wrote:
I understand your hype but it's no longer possible to find new openings, now there is only room for creativity in novelties in already estabilished openings
It is possible, but you have to look hard.
a new opening is totally impossible as years and years of practice and research have found every single opening that deserves a name, the future of inventions in openings is only on novelties
This looks like a new gambit with a trap !
Oct 8, 2021
0
#10
As pointed out, it’s the Goring gambit. It can also arise from the Scotch. Everything has been played. Even the new Jobava London, which sounds new, isn’t. It’s a new name given to an old opening for marketing reasons. Simon Williams has done this more than once by slapping a new name on an old opening and selling DVDs. The best anyone can really hope for is to either get some variation of a line named after them, or add so much new theory to an old opening that people start calling it by your name.
ConfusedGhoul wrote:
a new opening is totally impossible as years and years of practice and research have found every single opening that deserves a name, the future of inventions in openings is only on novelties
You would honestly be surprised how much playable chess is relatively unexplored 4 moves in. This game is fabulously complex. Now, you're probably not going to find anything I'd classify as more than 'surprise-weapon grade' in that range, but there are some fascinating ones.
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
lol not a gambit
What do you mean by lol not a gambit ? @ChesswithNickolay pls explain
Actually black can just win alot quicker with 21.Qd7!!!
To be honest for post #9 21.Qd7!!! was my old prep the prep I did while playing a daily game but i forgot it and on post #9 is new dicey prep I invented after forgetting my old prep on the AV-Double Nakhmanson Gambit as reffered to on post #9
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
adityasaxena4 wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
lol not a gambit
What do you mean by lol not a gambit ? @ChesswithNickolay pls explain
I mean that this isn't a gambit you created, it already is a gambit.
You mean e4 e5 Nc3 b5 is already a gambit ?! even the AV-Nakhmanson Gambit with Rb8+ on move 20 is also already a gambit?! How , and who else plays it? Also , if it's so well known where is the name for it it doesn't show on Chess.com either definetly not in the Explorer or in the Openings sections ?
There are losing gambits that are named as well, but if someone comes up with a novelty gambit on move 28 of a sideline of the archangel for example it's still a new gambit
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Sure, there are some gambits that are losing by a pawn, but definitely not a change of 3.
What do you mean a change of 3 ?
Oct 11, 2021
0
#18
Lots of losing gambits are played because they offer practical chances. I think computers rate the double Muzio Gambit as outright losing, But I’ve never not won it when I’ve had the chance to spring it on someone.
What's the name of this gambit ? If it's already there !