I want to try out London System. Any tips?


The London system is an extremely flexible setup of peices and pawn that lets you pretty much get a guranteed good game (there are some anti londons, but you will come to find those as you play.) I recommend the video by GothamChess if you wanna learn more, but it is a really good opening that I used to play a ton (and I likely will return to)


London tips and tricks: only play the Accelerated London against 1… d5 as otherwise Black can play a hypermodern g6 system which the London does poorly against, play Bg3 against Nh5/Bd6 and retake with whichever pawn is blocking your rook, only play c3 once Black has committed to e6 or if you’re already developed enough to have played Bd3 already, against an early Bf5 play c4 Nc3 Qb3 and if Black plays Qb6 play c5 axb3, if Black threatens to push e5 as a pawn break play Ne5 and reinforce it with Ndf3 if necessary, if Black plays passively and castles kingside play d4 Nf3 Bf4 Nbd2 Bd3 c3 Qc2 0-0-0 Rdg1 and pawn storm the kingside.
That’s all I can think of at the moment, if you need clarification or have any more questions about what to do in the London I’ll come back later with answers.

Oh, and if you do not like the London System, what opening would you recommend I try out?
It depends on your goal. If your goal is to improve at chess and keep improving to the best of your ability, then I don't recommend it. You should stick to principled classical openings like the Italian, Scotch, Queens Gambit, or Ruy Lopez. The London is not a good opening for chess improvement. If you play chess for fun and just want to learn an opening in 5 minutes then go for it.

It depends on your goal. If your goal is to improve at chess and keep improving to the best of your ability, then I don't recommend it. You should stick to principled classical openings like the Italian, Scotch, Queens Gambit, or Ruy Lopez. The London is not a good opening for chess improvement. If you play chess for fun and just want to learn an opening in 5 minutes then go for it.
I'll keep that in mind, thank you.

The idea is simple

I‘d advise you not to play it. the life as a London system player is lonely and miserable.. no one will like you, you won’t have any friends, so just don’t do it! be better than that and just play e4 or something else

It's O.K. Niles... I don't mind the London. You won't get the chance to play it against me, but i don't mind it

I‘d advise you not to play it. the life as a London system player is lonely and miserable.. no one will like you, you won’t have any friends, so just don’t do it! be better than that and just play e4 or something else
There you have it, the memers have arrived.

Oh, and if you do not like the London System, what opening would you recommend I try out?
It depends on your goal. If your goal is to improve at chess and keep improving to the best of your ability, then I don't recommend it. You should stick to principled classical openings like the Italian, Scotch, Queens Gambit, or Ruy Lopez. The London is not a good opening for chess improvement. If you play chess for fun and just want to learn an opening in 5 minutes then go for it.
You’re 1900 but your comment reads like a 900. You name the first 4 openings everyone learns (of which one is actively a detriment to your point of not picking noob trap openings) and then go on to call the London bad for player development. On what basis? It’s MUCH better than the SCOTCH! It’s also better than the Italian.
In the London, you learn how to delay moves, you learn how to stop pawn breaks, you learn how to attack with pieces, you learn how to attack with pawns, you learn how to attack kingside, queenside, and center, you learn how to keep tension and break if when necessary, you learn how to play both passive positional setups and tactical theoretical lines. It’s great for beginners.
You know what the Scotch teaches you? It teaches you how to give Black a free way to relieve the tension on their weakest pawn on move 3.