King's Gambit: Muzio Gambit or Ghulam Kassim Gambit?

For those King's Gambit Players:

Do you like the 

Muzio Gambit 

https://www.chess.com/openings/Kings-Gambit-Accepted-Muzio-Gambit

Or the Ghulam Kassim Gambit

https://www.chess.com/openings/Kings-Gambit-Accepted-Ghulam-Kassim-Gambit

I usually play the Muzio, but the other seems like it might even work better.

Any King's Gambit experts have experiences with both?

single muzio and falkbeer as black.

Do you mean this?

https://www.chess.com/openings/Kings-Gambit-Accepted-Salvio-Gambit

I guess there’s a name for just about everything

Hi! Thank you for your response. I don't know much about all the variations of King's Gambit. I just play it if it is fit in my Philidors repertoire I am using but I will give you a Link to further you know about it. Here it is. https://poshukach.com/search?fr=ps&gp=813093&altserp=1&q=chessgames.com+king%27s+gambit

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1013666 ; https://www.chessgames.com/perl/collections?search=king%27s+gambit ;

The Muzio is lots of fun, but I haven’t had much success with it at longer time controls. 

I cannot see how the Muzio is so bad. In the masters database, white usually plays 4. h4 rather than 4 Bc4, but black plays 4 Bc4 Bg7, avoiding the Muzio. It is not played at the top level mainly because black does not want to play into it, not white.

5 0-0 is a little better than 5. d4, which was played a lot in the 19th century.

Have you played both?

I won book https://www.qualitychess.co.uk/products/1/124/the_kings_gambit_by_john_shaw/ and I change my opinion. Now I play 4. Nc3

There is similar gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Nc3 d6 5.d4 g4 6.Bxf4 gxf3 7.Qxf3 and it looks better than Muzio. 

It would seem that way, but my only ever win against an IM came in a daily game in which I played a Double Muzio.  Life's weird sometimes.

OP, you're aware that 4. Bc4 isn't the only option, right?  And that you don't only have these two to choose between.  4. h4 is the main line, of course, and as another poster points out, 4. Nc3 is interesting and well worth trying.  (That's without even mentioning 3. Bc4.)

That does look interesting.  It looks like its called:

King's Gambit Accepted: Rosentreter, Sørensen Gambit

https://www.chess.com/openings/Kings-Gambit-Accepted-Rosentreter-Sorensen-Gambit

Is this the one you are talking about?

Thanks.  Yeah, I looked at the main line but never played it.

The Muzio is really what Chess is all about for me, sacrificing and getting Spectacular Attacks and Checkmates (or losses, ha).

I love winning and checkmating with less pieces on the board than my opponents.

That to me is Real Style.

Which do you like the best?

I haven't played them, but playing 5 d4, Nc3, or Bxf7+,  rather than 0-0, all could be effective against opponents who sort of know the Muzio, at fast time controls and/or against not really strong players. Those lines are objectively inferior, but were common like in the mid 19th century. 

I think so too.

I love that mid 19th century style of Chess.

That is why it is so hard to get away from The King's Gambit.

So many of my favorite Chess games in history were King's Gambit.