Interesting...
Novelty..

Here are a few games...
[Event "EM/CL/Q04-1 email"]
[Site "ICCF Email"]
[Date "2002.06.15"]
[Round "0"]
[White "Gubas,Jan"]
[Black "Valet,Richard"]
[Result "1/2"]
[Eco "B33"]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 Nxd5 8.exd5 Nb8
9.Qf3 a6 10.Qa3 b6 11.Bg5 f6 12.Be3 Be7 13.Be2 Bb7 14.Nc3 f5 15.f4 Nd7 16.0-0-0 0-0
17.Rhf1 b5 18.g4 exf4 19.Bxf4 Qb6 20.Qb4 Qc5 21.Qxc5 1/2
Usually 12...Bb7 has been tried...
[Event "W-ch26 sf05 email"]
[Site "ICCF Email"]
[Date "2002.??.??"]
[Round "0"]
[White "Pauwels,Christophe"]
[Black "De Groot,Adrianus Dingeman"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Eco "B33"]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 Nxd5 8.exd5 Nb8
9.Qf3 a6 10.Qa3 b6 11.Bg5 f6 12.Be3 Bb7 13.Nc3 f5 14.f4 Be7 15.Be2 Nd7 16.0-0-0 0-0
17.Rhf1 exf4 18.Bxf4 Nc5 19.Kb1 Bg5 20.g4 fxg4 21.Bg3 Rxf1 22.Rxf1 h5 23.b4 Nd7 24.Ne4 Qe7
25.Bd3 Ne5 26.Nxg5 Nxd3 27.Qxd3 Qxg5 28.Rf5 Qh6 29.Qe4 Qg6 30.Bh4 g3 31.Bxg3 b5 32.Kb2 Rc8
33.a3 Qe8 34.Qd3 Rd8 35.Bf2 Bc8 36.Rg5 Bg4 37.Bd4 Rd7 38.h3 Be2 39.Qg3 Qf8 40.Rg6 Bd1
41.Rf6 Qe8 42.Re6 Qf7 43.Kc1 h4 44.Qxh4 Bf3 45.Qg5 Qh5 46.Qg3 Bxd5 47.Rg6 1-0
[Event "IECC M email"]
[Site "IECC email"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "0"]
[White "Laliga,Jose Olivier"]
[Black "Sanchez Redondo,Jaime"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Eco "B33"]
1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 Nxd5 8.exd5 Nb8
9.Qf3 a6 10.Qa3 b6 11.Bg5 f6 12.Be3 Bb7 13.Nc3 Be7 14.Bd3 0-0 15.Qb4 Nd7 16.Qg4 Re8
17.Qe6+ Kh8 18.Qh3 Nf8 19.0-0 Bc8 20.Bf5 Bxf5 21.Qxf5 Ng6 22.a4 Qb8 23.Ra3 Rc8 24.Rb3 Bd8
25.Qd7 Bc7 26.Rd1 Rd8 27.Qh3 Qb7 28.Ne4 Rac8 29.Bg5 fxg5 30.Nxg5 Nf8 31.Rf3 h6 32.Nf7+ Kh7
33.Qf5+ 1-0
[Event "EU-ch65 sf05 email"]
[Site "ICCF Email"]
[Date "2003.01.09"]
[Round "0"]
[White "Pauwels,Christophe"]
[Black "Patzer,Joerg"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Eco "B33"]
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 Nxd5 8.exd5 Nb8
9.Qf3 a6 10.Qa3 b6 11.Bg5 f6 12.Be3 Bb7 13.Nc3 f5 14.f4 Be7 15.Be2 Nd7 16.0-0-0 0-0
17.Rhf1 exf4 18.Bxf4 Nc5 19.Kb1 Bg5 20.g4 fxg4 21.Bg3 h5 22.b4 Nd7 23.Ne4 Rxf1 24.Rxf1 Bxd5
25.Qd3 Bxe4 26.Qxe4 Nf6 27.Qg6 Qe7 28.Bd3 h4 29.Qxg5 hxg3 30.Bc4+ d5 31.Bxd5+ Nxd5 32.Qxd5+ Kh7
33.hxg3 Qxb4+ 34.Kc1 Rf8 35.Rh1+ Kg6 36.Qh5+ Kf6 37.Rf1+ Ke7 38.Qe5+ Kd7 39.Qxg7+ Ke8 40.Rxf8+ Qxf8
41.Qxf8+ Kxf8 42.Kd2 1-0

Ok.. so I did not have these games in my database.. haha. Erik.. you just had to show this terrible game I played with you. tsk tsk... thanks for those games sticknight! I have added them... I still am not liking the Pelikan...
lol, the computer actually only showed 5 innacuracies(unfortunately the last one was a game loser). I actually thought it was a very logical and well played game up until you moved the queen again(I started playing rather awkwardly as well). Q-c8 was a nice move which I had not even considered on your part.
http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=21260551
apparently b-g5 was a novelty and according to my opponent he was expecting queenside castles(later when I castled kingside-but he did just lock up the center so that made the kingside castling much more safe.
For some reason I moved k-h1 instead of the immediate g4(I thought it wasn't possible because of the hanging c4 pawn...But, blacks hanging knight would have been more valuable than that c4 pawn I guess). Computer analysis did indicate that g4 was best(Although much of the computer analysis looked odd to me.)
Obviously he blundered at the end of the game..But, I would like to hear some ideas on the opening mainly. Of course analysis on the rest of the game would be greatly appreciated as well.