Here I'll reverse the correspondence presented in my previous topic:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/eco-pscc-correspondence
Irregular openings with A00 code appear within all pawn structures. So we'll consider only regular openings. As noticed in this thread
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/classification-and-taxonomy-hierarchy-of-normal-central-openings
all openings can be naturally divided into 9 big parts:
I denotes the initial pawn structure.
1) Hippo vs Hippo
1.1) I [I vs I] (height 0=0+0): A04-05 Réti opening
Example. Réti opening: Black Mustang defense
1.2) 1B [1B vs I] (height 1=1+0): A01 Nimzo-Larsen attack
Example. 1. b3 Nf6
So we see that in this category [Hippo vs Hippo], all regular openings have only the following ECO codes: A01, A04 and A05.
(to be continued)
2) Hippo vs Normal
2.1) 2d [I vs 2d] (height 2=0+2): A06 Réti: Queen's pawn
→ 2d1G [1G vs 2d] A07 King's Indian attack (KIA)
→ 2cd1G [1G vs 2cd] A08 KIA: Sicilian variation
Here I'll reverse the correspondence presented in my previous topic:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/eco-pscc-correspondence
Irregular openings with A00 code appear within all pawn structures. So we'll consider only regular openings. As noticed in this thread
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/classification-and-taxonomy-hierarchy-of-normal-central-openings
all openings can be naturally divided into 9 big parts:
I denotes the initial pawn structure.
1) Hippo vs Hippo
1.1) I [I vs I] (height 0=0+0): A04-05 Réti opening
Example. Réti opening: Black Mustang defense
1.2) 1B [1B vs I] (height 1=1+0): A01 Nimzo-Larsen attack
Example. 1. b3 Nf6
So we see that in this category [Hippo vs Hippo], all regular openings have only the following ECO codes: A01, A04 and A05.

(to be continued)