I would guess it is because the decision to play c3 or Nc3 is a permanent one, and it will affect the whole course of the game. 3.Nf3 seems to be ok, but it just postpones the choice between c3 and Nc3. Also, playing Nf3 rules out the option of playing f3 or f4, doesn't it? It's just one decision after another! That's why chess is hard
Thank you for your advice.
So, is it like this?
1, I'm thinking that the kingside attack will be effective.
2, so maybe f2-f4 can be needed.
3, on the other hand it is not likely to happen c2-c4 immidiately.
4, so before f-file, let's decide how to play on c-file!
Anyway, thank you very much for advising me !
I'm reading a book which is titled "UNDERSTANDING CHESS MOVE BY MOVE" by John Nunn, and I have a question in it.
In the game 3, the game begins with
1 e4 g6
2 d4 Bg7
and then, white plays 3 Nc3 and the author comments that
"White must choose whether to occupy c3 with his c-pawn or his knight."
If I were white I would play Nf3 to reinforce d4 pawn.
I guess this is also acceptable move
but why does the author recommend to put some material on c3 in first ?
I'd like to know why it is.
Thank you.