Inexplicably the then world champion Anand played the dodgy triangular slav in the 2013 match against Carlsen, and Carlsen didn't try to refute the Marshall Gambit with 6Bd2.
Don't think any 1.d4 club player refuting the gambit anytime soon. Especially as most are not particularly at home in sharp positions.
c6-d5-e6 is the "triangular" Slav - it's not very good and is rare among the top players.
According to the lichess database it's not the Marshall Gambit until Bd2. White can bring the knight back to c3 and still be ahead or he can go Bd2. Check the statistics among strong players - 56% win rate, check the computer, +0.4. e4 actually has the best results of any of the moves among top players.
According to the lichess database 3. ... Nf6 is 21 times more common than e6 or the triangular slav). What does Nf6 prevent? The only move it prevents is e4, if you play e3 then they can just play Nf6 on the next move and will have escaped. It's black who is playing a dodgy line, not white. White is absolutely correct, the question is how to "refute" the triangular Slav.
The only reason I can think of why e4 isn't the most common continuation for white is because they're afraid of being caught up by tricky black preparation.