Not really. Play what you feel is right and let your mistakes be your best teacher.Though on the flipside you can't lock yourself up in a room for 10 years and re-invent openings either.
Good players tend to do the right balance both => Learn a few basic opening moves and then start to customize it and make it their own. The ones who start memorizing theory when they haven't even gotten to where they can hold their own in an endgame are just deluding themselves.
A kid I'm teaching right now likes to play 1.c4 (for the heck of it!!!), get her pieces out, look for pawn-breaks and strives to open up the board. That is as FAR as she's thought things out. Of course she's following good opening principles but she's certainly not playing "standard" lines as you suggested. Is this wrong? For a newbie, absolutely not!!
Of course, when she gets stronger, she'll need to start reading up on what the big boys are playing these days.
What worked for me when I was a beginner was to sample openings the way you'd sample new ice-cream flavors. Find the one that seems to jump out at you as fun ... and go for it. No matter if is insanely aggressive or completely boring , as long as you think you can be "comfy" where the pieces need to be and enjoy the kinds of positions it brings out, it starts to become your reliable friend in chess.
It also serves as a wonderful springboard from where you can jump off to other openings once you get more experience.
as a newbie and limited playing time, please forgive if this info somewhere on this site.
should you always open a game with some 'standard' openings, just to get going?