The Queens Gambit

I note you said that "the knight will almost certainly reach c5" at which point black will simply swap the other Bishop for it. Please play this gambit against me!!!

This one gave me a good laugh. The Queen's Gambit! So now I will lose in the first 10 moves with the King's gambit!

that is manic sacrifice the night will be good but after afew exchaning moves the central night will mean nothing good luck developing it but i think it flawed

And btw i belive a4 is not good place for a knight in this position because it isnt doing anything there and doesnt have any real prospects there. c3 was a much better square because knight puts more influence on the center and has more squares to go to in the future.Other thing about the bishop pair.In QGD white often has problems developing lightsquare bishop.So exchanging bad bishop for a queen and posting a knight on a not so good square, i would say this is pretty nice deal!

lol I can see this being another one of those threads lasting about 10 pages where half get the joke, and half react angrily.

ok so to give it a serious spin, are there any proper openings where a piece (not pawn) is gambited?

ok so to give it a serious spin, are there any proper openings where a piece (not pawn) is gambited?
Halloween Gambit.
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5?!

ok so to give it a serious spin, are there any proper openings where a piece (not pawn) is gambited?
Halloween Gambit.
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5?!
Yes, I've given that one a few spins around the block. IMAO it should be 4. Nxe5!?

ok so to give it a serious spin, are there any proper openings where a piece (not pawn) is gambited?
Halloween Gambit.
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5?!
Yes, I've given that one a few spins around the block. IMAO it should be 4. Nxe5!?
Oh, I agree. I just thought that the 'agreed' annotation was that it was dubious.