The Sicilian

First of all - I need to know a few variations of the Sicilian.

Second of all, what is the point of the Sicilian generally? I play the Dragon, and all I know of is the quick development by Bg2 and then O-O. It also, in my opinion, opens up kingside and queenside. But what moves afterwards, and I need to know the theory behind it.

This is the Sicilian Dragon

Here's some interesting theory: http://sharpchess.wordpress.com/

yugoslav variation to be exact

I personally think the sicilian is weak.  It doesn't get a good share of the center, and leaves many pieces undeveloped.

I play the dragon as well,wish I understood it better.I live in constant fear of the dark squared bishops getting traded with the enemy queen supporting the diagonal intrusion weakening the dark squares around my king 

 I hope your joking. Otherwise it wouldn't be the most used defense in GM games vs e4.

The main thing you have to decide when playing the  sicilian is what variation you will play.

The next is the paulsen sicilian where the black side takes on a light squared weakness in exchange for a stronger pawn structure that should prove useful in the endgame.

The next one of which I don't know the name was a favourite of fischers and kasparov (can't go wrong there!) notably because of the agressive najdorf,dragon and pelikan systems  but also due to it's dynamic ability to transpose into nearly any other sicilian dynamic and non-commital.

 My friend I must say that you are wrong, while it os true that white developes just a little bit more quickly, c5 does claims the center controling the d4 square and black have the advantage of a better pawn structure and the idea its to create asymmetry to unbalance the position so it does not end in a draw

So much good theory :O thanks guys. I haven't really gotten serious in chess, except for just a few months ago. The Sicilian looked pretty good in games, so I'm interested in it. Also, in my level of play, the Sicilian is unprepared for.