Pro: simple and straightforward.
Con: passive.
Be careful! Repeating lame philidor moves in every game without thinking causes brain damage. Other disadvantages are lowered tactical vision and bad decision making in all positions. I warned you...
Here is a good variation against the philidor. Works everytime:
This wins everytime because philidor players can't deviate from "theory" h6, Nf8, g5, Ng6 will be played in everygame without thinking.
Be careful! Repeating lame philidor moves in every game without thinking causes brain damage. Other disadvantages are lowered tactical vision and bad decision making in all positions. I warned you...
Alright, I threw this together. This is very far from a comprehensive guide, but I tried to get as much in there as I could. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Ok, There are quite a few mixed opinions as expected. I will get to most of the other responses in time, but to the people saying that the Phildor defence is bad - do you have any suggestions of a better response to 2. Nf3?
Ok, There are quite a few mixed opinions as expected. I will get to most of the other responses in time, but to the people saying that the Phildor defence is bad - do you have any suggestions of a better response to 2. Nf3?
Not difficult to recommend 2...Nc6 or 2...Nf6 : u develop piece and don't create a cramped position (if u play closed philidor, i call open philidor with exd4 soon).
Nevertheless Philidor defence is quite good but not easy to handle. 2...Nc6 is more educational and 2...Nf6 can be depressing for white because highly difficult to find a white advantage and create something. But this is for high level players, for you everything is playable.
Did u notice many players prefer Pirc move order?
There is some reason but i don't see anyone explaining it (a bit ridiculous isn't it)...
I can if u want but that's another story...
Pros will play it because they know what they're doing.
Noobs will play it because they have no idea what they're doing.
Not many people in between play it.
{I saw a similar comment to this a while ago, and I agree}
If you're looking to play the philidor then take a look at Jobava Baadur's games.
http://www.chessgames.com/player/baadur_jobava.html
I played against Philidor and Lion and they are not easy defense to play against because of their dynamic quality in their defense.
Mickynj, GMs play the Philidor and its a very tricky opening; the defense is very playable.
Ok thanks for that. I will try having a look at that move order when i can
With this line did you mean (3. Nc3)? The current line gives two moves in a row for black (which I wouldn't mind, but can't have unfortunately)
In Master Games here on this site, 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 (2...d6 is the third most common response here) has a win rate of 45 percent for white, 28 percent draws and 27 percent for black. 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 (the most common response) wins 37 percent of the time for white, 36 percent end up in draws and 27 percent end up in wins for black. That's a pretty dramatic difference.
I have been using the Philidor defence in a few more games recently. By coincidence, I have also been facing it more. I don't have great opening knowledge, but at the moment I don't mind it so much.
Can you give me some advice on the pros and cons of playing it?
Thank you