Took the bait for the Queen sac,and got hooked, lol.

i am IRON HORSE in this game. i learned this opening from my chess web site  www.thechesspub.com, just type in search on videos page (Queen sac).

LOL! NICE!!!

It's one of the many variants of the famous Legall's mate, although here unfortunately black has 8...Nxe5 0-1

yes, it's an oldie but goodie, lol.

got it thnk you shark like it

Boy, this is some horrible chess by both players. 

7.f6?  Uhm, why not either 7...Qd7, 7...Qe7, or 7...Bxf3, all eliminating the blatant threats on f7?

8.Ne5?? Uhm, 8.Qb3 just wins!

8...Bxd1??? (Yes, 3 question marks, 2 ain't enough).  Uhm, 8...Nxe5 just wins on the spot for Black.  The move played allows a deviation of Legall's Mate!

Do not come to my page and call my chess horrable, or any one else here at chess.com,theres no reason for that, except maby your self esteem is so low, u have to try and blow out another man"s candel to let your own light shine, thats lame and a verry dark and dim, (pun intended) attitude. and verry rude, and as a matter of fact, all the moves i made were text book moves, It  shows how much u know.and not only about the game u punk, but also about sportsmanship.it's little punks like u that give chess players a bad name, the history of chess players, the best anyway, are viewed to be more refined, gentelman and ladys, of the king's game, as clearly you are neither.

there are 2 people that founded this group they are the Puppetter, and I,In the intro of this group, the group's description, the pupeeteer says disrespect of any player will not be tollerated , and i can assure you it will not,one more time son, and your gone if your a member, if u are not thank god.

I'm ashamed to see you're as old as me - after an outburst like that I assumed you were about 13. ThrillerFan accurately states that the chess in that game is horrible (I've no idea why you'd think 5. a3 was "textbook") and although Black obligingly took the Queen sac and got mated for it, he played several bad moves up to and including 8. ... Bxd1; as ThrillerFan correctly states, Black can win a piece instead and White gets nothing for it, although in a game of this standard, a piece the more or less is no guarantee of anything.

For crying out loud, if you're not prepared to handle a little criticism then don't post your games as if they were the greatest brilliancies since Philidor first pushed a pawn. 

ETA: Also, don't post a game to LOL about your opponent and then bleat about "disrespect".

I am afraid I must agree with ThrillerFan's analysis of the game. Both players demonstrated a horrible sequence of moves. If you cannot handle the criticism about the games you post, then do not post them. When I come across a posted chess game here, I hope to learn learn something from it and I honestly believe this sets a bad example. And please do not go about blasting people like you have done here. If you think wat you have done is logical, then justify it.

To begin with, tell me why you made your a3 ?

all your nicknames are really...picturesque I must say.

Mine's down to being a Tolkien fan - it's "Star-harp" in Sindarin Elvish, a name I made up for a fictional Elvish minstrel. And yours...?

how can book moves be horrable, we were still in the opening,it wasnt realy a game per say,there was no middle and end game,once again how can opening moves book moves be horrable,u boys are lost.

This is not YOUR page.  This is the public forum, fool!

And what "book" are your moves from?  One you wrote?

State the source and page numbers, then you MIGHT have some credibility, but until then, the others are right, you are making a complete fool of yourself!

As a previous commenter said, even 5.a3 is not good.

I will give you thru White's 4th move, you have a book line, by transposition.  After that, 4...d6 might be some sideline that's "ok", but moves like 4...Nf6 or 4...Bc5 are far more common.

I play 1...e5 as Black, and am rated 2059 over the board.  I know more than you think.

and u are still a rude man

and not verry smart calling book moves, horrible

criticism is one thing calling someones game horrible is another.u boys got no class.

a 3 is a move played by many masters as well as many others, u need to go watch some masters games sonny, lol.

Some of the remarks above are a little harsh. For all of the questionable moves, SHARK-BLUE_DRAGON did get a win here after all!  Always worth trying this trap if you think you can get away with it but be warned - more experienced players recognise it & won't be fooled. After all, it's been around for about 200 years(?)

But one remark you make that really needs challenging  is 'text book moves' - that they're not!  What was a3 for ? And d4? - it just resulted in blocking you from bringing your knight to c3. Nothing text book about those I'm afraid.

The fly in the ointment is ...Nc6, then it can take on e5 & protect Black's bishop at the same time.  I think the standard response is to play h3, thereby (you hope) driving the bishop back to h5 - something like this...

I remember when I saw this for the first time, I did a double-take when it got to mate.