What are some of the most aggressive chess openings?

Sort:
GooseOnDaLoose
Don’t say Danish Gambit please
KeSetoKaiba

Anything sharp basically grin.png

stickinkpink

shredding the wrapping packaging and product inside in one grab...opened

Yigor

Mokele Mbembe. blitz.pngpeshka.png

DasBurner

Muzio Gambit!!!

Black has to play extremely precisely

myusername456456

Sicilian

lildasx
DaBabysSideTing wrote:

Muzio Gambit!!!

Black has to play extremely precisely

at the GM level it is just a draw

DasBurner
lildasx wrote:
DaBabysSideTing wrote:

Muzio Gambit!!!

Black has to play extremely precisely

at the GM level it is just a draw

1. yes it is, that is true

2. White can deviate from the main line with 7. d3 and explore into uncharted territory where Black has to play ugly moves like c6 to hold onto any advantage. 

3. anything other than the main line qf6 gives white a small advantage

You can rely on me for this, I have the Muzio analyzed down to like move 25 at least

Mikhail60Mikhail

The most aggressive game against kings Indian defence is the Saemisch game.

the idea is to stick your Queen behind the bishop allowing the bishop to attack on the diagonal with support behind it. 
castle Queen side and attack with pawns to open up the H file to allow the rook to unite with the bishop attack on the diagonal attacking kings side of black. 
You can also castle king side.

Fischer hated playing against this 

one of his biggest fears with Spassky was the fact Spassky was very well versed in Saemisch variations.

Mikhail60Mikhail

 

GooseOnDaLoose
DaBabysSideTing wrote:

Muzio Gambit!!!

Black has to play extremely precisely

Ooh that one looks scary for black, thanks!

ThrillerFan
lildasx wrote:
DaBabysSideTing wrote:

Muzio Gambit!!!

Black has to play extremely precisely

at the GM level it is just a draw

 

You sure about that?

I thought they found a forced win, for Black that is, and that was why the few that play the KG were playing the Kesiritzsky instead.

ThrillerFan
Mikhail60Mikhail wrote:

The most aggressive game against kings Indian defence is the Saemisch game.

the idea is to stick your Queen behind the bishop allowing the bishop to attack on the diagonal with support behind it. 
castle Queen side and attack with pawns to open up the H file to allow the rook to unite with the bishop attack on the diagonal attacking kings side of black. 
You can also castle king side.

Fischer hated playing against this 

one of his biggest fears with Spassky was the fact Spassky was very well versed in Saemisch variations.

 

Actually, the most aggressive is the four pawns attack.  There is some question to its soundness, but you said aggressive, not sound.

Born2slaYer

Openings don't matter all that matters is your experience, you should learn the idea of the opening instead.

KovenFan
Mikhail60Mikhail wrote:

The most aggressive game against kings Indian defence is the Saemisch game.

the idea is to stick your Queen behind the bishop allowing the bishop to attack on the diagonal with support behind it. 
castle Queen side and attack with pawns to open up the H file to allow the rook to unite with the bishop attack on the diagonal attacking kings side of black. 
You can also castle king side.

Fischer hated playing against this 

one of his biggest fears with Spassky was the fact Spassky was very well versed in Saemisch variations.

I started playing the Saemisch because everyone always talked about how aggressive it was but I was always the one getting attacked. If you look at some John Nunn games as black against the Saemisch you'll see some of the attacks black gets are just devastating.

I find the four pawn attack more comfortable

 

Mikhail60Mikhail

I seldom play the four pawn attack but maybe I should play it more. 
I like keeping the Saemisch shape though as I find it counters king side attacks early in the game with the shape but it leaves Queen side open to attack. 

DasBurner
ThrillerFan wrote:
lildasx wrote:
DaBabysSideTing wrote:

Muzio Gambit!!!

Black has to play extremely precisely

at the GM level it is just a draw

 

You sure about that?

I thought they found a forced win, for Black that is, and that was why the few that play the KG were playing the Kesiritzsky instead.

The main line is a draw

GooseOnDaLoose
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

Openings don't matter all that matters is your experience, you should learn the idea of the opening instead.

Do the idea's of the openings come though experience or though teaching? or a little bit of both?

DasBurner
GooseOnDaLoose wrote:
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:

Openings don't matter all that matters is your experience, you should learn the idea of the opening instead.

Do the idea's of the openings come though experience or though teaching? or a little bit of both?

openings do matter. you gain those ideas, by playing certain openings many times

Mikhail60Mikhail

I have to agree. Half the issue with new players is finding their comfort zone and the best way to do that is find an opening that’s going to play to your strengths and not your weaknesses