What are the best openings for a beginner?

Sort:
marcushendriksen

My repertoire so far consists of the following:


White:

  • The London System
  • The Reti opening

Black:

  • The Dutch Defence (my go-to defence against 1. d4)
  • The Scandinavian Defence (when I get sick of the Dutch)
  • Alekhine's Defence (my go-to against 1. e4)

 

I've been doing some reading around and it seems the consensus is rather than learn variations and theory, a beginner should focus on learning just a few openings and defences for 1. d4 and 1. e4 while obtaining a good practical knowledge of the resulting positions.

With that in mind, I can already see that I lack any 1. e4 openings as white and I could do with another for 1. d4 (as apparently the Reti can turn into just about anything, so I don't count it as a separate opening). As for black, I feel pretty comfortable with what I use already but still, I could do with more variety.

I should note that I have a difficult time remembering strings upon strings of moves (a difficulty that I'm hoping time and experience will erode) - instead I rely on my own OTB analysis skills and knowledge of chess principles to evaluate the position at hand and decide what needs to be done. So I'd prefer suggestions that don't require me to learn endless tracts of theory and of course are relatively easy for beginners to play well. After all, I'm a uni student at the moment and don't have time to spare to analyze openings to death.

Cheers :)

AlisonHart

Keep it simple, keep it slow - higher rated players will tell you that you should study NO openings. I don't think this is quite realistic or fair - because opening knowledge is really all about learning how to get middlegames you are comfortable with, so you need to at least try to play some of the same moves in order to really understand the 'world' created by a particular opening system. 

 

As white - pick a move. e4 and d4 are recommended, c4 is fine too (if you like quiet positions).

 

for e4:

 

Classical: Pick ONE and only ONE of these to study to about the tenth move - Ruy Lopez, Italian Game, Scotch Game. 

 

Sicilian: Maybe start with the c3 (AKA Alapin) because it doesn't have the sheer volume of theoretical variations that you'll get from an open Sicilian. c3 controls black's options for response. 

 

Caro Kann and French: I'll lump them because the pawn structures are similar - they are definitely NOT the same though. You'll either want to play an exchange, an advanced, or a classical. JUST PICK ONE 

 

Scandanavian: I don't know the lines, but it will come up, so look at it and pick ONE variation that will be 'yours' 

 

Alekhine: Just chase the knight, play d4, chase the knight again, and let the game flow naturally. Alekhine is fluid, don't bother preparing your lines too deeply. 

 

for d4:

 

Classical: Just play the Queen's Gambit - it's the 'best by test' (so to speak)...London is tried and sworn by, but just play the QG; you'll thank yourself.

 

King's Indian defense: There's a consistent development pattern for all the variations - play it, mind your center, and attack on the queen side, and you'll be OK.

 

Nimzo Indian: Mind the e4 square, choose how you're going to recapture the knight if it's taken (the queen or the b pawn), and look out for the counterattack with c5. 

 

Grunfeld: Look at example games....this is the hardest thing you'll face because it is highly tactical and hard to predict - luckily it's also rare. 

 

For c4: Look at the symmetrical English with ...c5 (which is an exact mirror) and look at the Sicilian from black's perspective to deal with ...e5 (which makes your position a backward Sicilian)

 

For BLACK - pick an e4 opening and a d4 opening and learn JUST THAT ONE - don't go crazy building a giant repetoire.

 

In general: DO NOT memorize moves and try to learn everything all at once. You will forget your theory, get it all tangled up, walk 13 moves in to a main line, forget the 14th, and be killed. Save yourself the heartache. What you need is to think about these positions in terms of a pattern of development  and a pawn structure because, while individual moves change, those concrete features will be somewhat reusable from one game to the next (Example: the bishop in Queen's gambit almost always goes to g5...if you put it on g5 - whether or not theory says it's the right move - you've almost definitely helped your position). 

 

Think of theory as a magical chess Yoda: It suggests moves to you, but you are the one who must play them, so learn the moves, but, more importantly, learn WHY you're playing them. 

 

All the best!

AlisonHart

Oh, I also play the Dutch.....and I have made the sinful effort to learn Alekhine's - play your Scandanavian :) - it will save you the heartache of learning Alekhine........it's an abusive girlfriend of an opening

marcushendriksen

Thanks for your advice AlisonHart - it was most helpful!

I've decided to drop Alekhine's Defence and focus on the Sicilian and Scandinavian Defence against 1. e4 (I've gone over my win/loss record when using Alekhine's and you were totally right about it, lol). I think I'll rely on the Dutch and KID against 1. d4 for the time being.

I've gotten pretty good results with the London System/Reti opening so I'm definitely sticking with that. I'll be incorporating the QG as per your suggestion though. I've yet to decide on anything for a King's Pawn opening - in fact I might just delay choosing one in favour of getting the Queen's Pawn game down first.

Again, thanks for the advice :)

JGambit

The best opening is the one where you understand why you are playing what you are playing. as a begineer try out the ruy and try to understand why each move is what it is.

JGambit

the people above had way better comments then me. If you are going to try a Kings pawn the ruy is very interesting to learn.

AlisonHart

Somehow - except for the London - you and I have decided to try out ALL of the same things! I still open 1.Nf3 very often, but I don't play the KIA - I play 1.Nf3 2.c4, but I try to transpose in to something from the d4 library as quickly as I can. 

 

Don't worry about e4 - if you play 1.e4, you'll have to learn another big pile of black's responses in order to deal with it. Just concentrate on a small bag of ideas for white - because your white repertoire is always going to be three times (or more) the size of your black repertoire....it's just the way of chess.

 

Look at the Catalan - it's a d4 version of a kingside fianchetto (so it is a sister to the Reti and is often reached by 1.Nf3). As for your ideas as black, try to play either the Sicilian OR the Scandanavian rather than both. I know it can feel boring to play the same opening every time, but specialization is a powerful ally. 

 

As someone who is tempted to learn every opening and study all the crazy cool sounding variations, I will tell you that it is a waste of time to try and learn how to do everything at our level. Get a few pet creatures, raise them well, and you will have monsters on your side!

 

(oh, and stay away from anything with a really long title in ECO - because it's a variation so obscure that you'll never get it "The Spanish Tartakower-Jones Minsk Gambit Accepted, Declined, and Then Accepted Again, Two Bishops Variation" - stay away from that junk, it's a bunny trail!!)

SquareShot

As white you have three options: 1.e4, 1.d4, and 1.c4. Do you want to learn something new, or build on what you already know?

1.e4: Spanish, Italian, Scotch, and Four Knights are all good choices. You'll also need to have something for black's other main options (Sicilian, French, etc.).

1.d4: Add to your 1.d4 repertoire by starting to play Queen's Gambit and Benoni lines. The London system has its problems against certain defenses so it's good to have other options.

1.c4: You can learn some English to compliment your Reti as there are often transpositions between the two. A 1.c4 2.g3 3.Bg2 4.Nc3 move order against most of black's replies is probably a good practical way to go to minimise theory.

As black: You have a repertoire you're comfortable with so you should stick with it. You should learn openings one at a time and if you're happy with what you play as black there's no need to learn anything new. Expand on your white repertoire one opening at a time and don't forget to spend some time on tactics and endgames.

CJ_P

My favorit thrown around My favorite part of chess is the openings. I can say with out a doubt that I know more about openings than I will ever need to know.

That said.

You need to know what type of positions you like to play. Someone told me to try and see if I liked the Scotch game. It's an awsome opening, but after some brutal beatings by even lower rated players, it's on the back burner.

Do not listen to these people saying "only play e5 and d5" and all that crap. They're taking this board game way to serious.

Play what you want and what you are comfortable with.

Case and point. My brother played a surprise opening vs a person who is was way higher rated than him. My brother found a novelty over the board that traded his queen for a rook and knight, also compromising the enemy king, but the position according to houdini is dead equal. And the played to a draw!

Literaly, the opening did that for him. Know his opening and the type of position he wanted to play. Not this "only play standard move" crap that gets thrown around.

Thanatos_01

perhaps these will help you, (that's not the best play from black)

Thanatos_01

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/strong-openings-for-white?lc=1#last_comment

Stormstout

For a beginner 1.e4 e5, 1.d4 d5 and

http://www.chess.com/article/view/the-principles-of-the-opening

Till_98

how can you play the scandinavian against d4??? Because you said you play it when you get sick of the dutch...

marcushendriksen
Till_98 wrote:

how can you play the scandinavian against d4??? Because you said you play it when you get sick of the dutch...

Yeah I made a mistake there. I always play it against 1. e4

johnyoudell

Marcus you have played 32 games against opponents with an average rating of 1100 odd. I find it difficult to believe that you have played more than the first two or three moves in the openings you mention.

When you say that you have difficulty in memorising strings of moves and rely instead on your own examination of the position before you that is the way to continue to go. Learning strings of moves before you have any chance to understand the thinking behind each of the moves in that string is a mistake.

I have two suggestions to make. One is to spend a few minutes looking at a couple of formulations of the opening principles. There are lots of on-line resources, the Exeter chess club collection might be a good place to start http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/ten-rules-opening. Applying those principles will help you in your analysis rather than hindering it as learning strings of moves does.

Secondly, try the fried liver as white. It has a really simple idea - attack black's weak f7 square. You probably won't continue with it more than a year or two but in that time you have the chance to see how the cut and thrust of an opening works while relying on your own analytical skills rather than relying on strings of moves learned by heart.

This video might be a place to start https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ITi9Jc0J-o

marcushendriksen
johnyoudell wrote:

Marcus you have played 32 games against opponents with an average rating of 1100 odd. I find it difficult to believe that you have played more than the first two or three moves in the openings you mention.

When you say that you have difficulty in memorising strings of moves and rely instead on your own examination of the position before you that is the way to continue to go. Learning strings of moves before you have any chance to understand the thinking behind each of the moves in that string is a mistake.

I have two suggestions to make. One is to spend a few minutes looking at a couple of formulations of the opening principles. There are lots of on-line resources, the Exeter chess club collection might be a good place to start http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/ten-rules-opening. Applying those principles will help you in your analysis rather than hindering it as learning strings of moves does.

Secondly, try the fried liver as white. It has a really simple idea - attack black's weak f7 square. You probably won't continue with it more than a year or two but in that time you have the chance to see how the cut and thrust of an opening works while relying on your own analytical skills rather than relying on strings of moves learned by heart.

This video might be a place to start https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ITi9Jc0J-o

I've actually been a member of this site longer than my profile suggests - this is just my Facebook one 'cause it's easier to log in that way. So in actuality, I have played these openings right through.

That said, thanks heaps for your advice - especially the links :)