what is the best opening for tactical playerS?

Sort:
sande19

what is the best opening for tactical players.??

 

i want to develop my tactical plays.

 

because im a posotional play.

 

i get rid  of my other opponents that is tactical.

i always lose my game. or if i survive in the opening and middlegame. i will lose in endgame or middle game.

 

pls help me.

Shivsky

For White:

Given your live-chess rating, I might suggest you focus on gambits like the Danish or the King's for 1.e4 e5 responses.

Against 1...c6/e6, play the exchange variation .. it's okay to have the isolated pawn if you are "tactical" enough to grab the initiative by getting your pieces out and onto open files.

Against 1...d5, transpose to the Blackmar-Diemer gambit.

Once you get better, start playing more solid openings ... these attacking gambits are good at the lower levels of play, but not higher.

As Black: Try to avoid cramped openings and favor ones that involve pawn-exchanges that open up files. I can't really list ideas for each of White's moves, but look around. There are plenty of gambits to choose from.

sande19

i think gambits is not applicable in modern chess.?

NOLAUPT

im not sure but i need to learn won ya dig

VinceyPoo

there is nothing wrong with playing danish gambit or king's gambit in higher level of play.

gambits are not the only openings which are tactical. the semi slav seems to be pretty tactical along with the french winawer. KID and guicco piano are also considered to be sharp.

Niven42
sande19 wrote:

i think gambits is not applicable in modern chess.?


 

Gambit openings, by far, favor a tactical player.  The most volatile, I think is the Blackmar-Diemer.  I've had a lot of interesting games with that one.

 

Kasparov has played gambits quite often (he seems quite fond of the Evans).  To say that they're not applicable to modern Chess can mean that your understanding of a gambit is that you are creating a weakness in the pawn structure, which the post-modern school took as a no-no.  But after years of analysis and increasingly sophisticated Chess engines, it's not considered to be quite the taboo it once was, and contemporary players have taken to loosening up the pawn structure once in a while if it means they can get a better position.