If you want to hurt Frenchers, the exhange is right. But.. don't.
best variations to play against french defence
I used to play Qe2 against it but after a number of Otb defeats i have stopped and am thinking of playing the advance

If you want to hurt Frenchers, the exhange is right. But.. don't.
I'm curious about what this comment means. I know French players hate the Exchange Variation because it's so drawish, but what do you mean by "hurt"? Do you mean "annoy", or rather "beat"? And why do you say not to play it? Because it's so drawish?

The Qe2 Variation has an interesting idea but black has a bunch of ways to give white no advantage. He can even play 2...d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4. Nc3 Qd8 with the idea of playing 5...c5 where the queen on e2 is misplaced because it does not support the d-pawn and therefore white cannot play 5. d4.

well i play the tarrasch. its good...i mainly play it because it transposes to positions and position types i can get from other openings as well.
theres plenty of good stuff you can do against the french. the nc3 stuff is probably where you should start. They are all about equally good and i tihnk black can equalize against all of it. You just want to end up in some middlegame you can play
I think the best place to start learning about the French defence is with the Advance variation. Once, you have got the hang of Black's ideas about attacking pawn chains at the base and the head of the pawn chain then try something else. You will also find a number of the themes present in the Advance variation also occur in other variations.
Alternatively, try the Tarrasch, it is a lot less theory heavy than Nc3 and thus may be viewed as more suitable to your rating. Nc3 may lead to the Classical, Winawer, and Rubenstein. It White then does not fancy the Classical but would rather the more tactical Alekhine-Chatard attack then White will need to consider the McCutcheon , the Burn variation as well as the Alekhine-Chatard accepted and declined.

I used to play Qe2 against it but after a number of Otb defeats i have stopped and am thinking of playing the advance
I usually play 2. d3 and then 3. Qe2.

3.Nc3 is White's Strongest.
3.e5 is a close second. (Originally thought to be as benign as the Exchange, but many new ideas for White that are very strong came about around 2006/2007)
3.exd5 and 3.Nd2 are utter crap and give White nothing. Easy Equality for Black in both cases.
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2?! c5!! and now:
A) 4.Ngf3 Nf6 5.e5 Nfd7 and White is stuck playing the Korchnoi Gambit instead of main line closed Tarrasch, which White has nothing with correct play by black.
B) 4.exd5 exd5! and now:
B1) 5.Bb5+ Bd7! 6.Qe2+ Be7! 7.dxc5 temporarily wins a pawn, but again, with correct play, Black will eventually get the pawn back and White has no advantage.
B2) 5.Nf3 Nf6! (FAR SUPERIOR to the old 5.Nc6?! 6.Bb5 Bd6 7.dxc5 Bxc5+/=) 6.Bb5+ Bd7 and again White has Nada!

@ThrillerFan You are a very strong player and I recall that you used to play the French. What do you believe is white's strongest line against the Winawer if white wants to play 3. Nc3? I am looking at maybe switching from 3. Nd2 to 3. Nc3, and I have some good lines against 3...Nf6, but I am not sure what to play against black's more dynamic option.
Maybe he just says Nd2 is horrible because he is bad against it.
You will occasionally see me bad mouthing the french defense around these forums, but this is really just because I do poorly against it.

I completely agree with ThrillerFan's list, the Tarrash and the exchange are only good enough for a draw, your best bets are the Paulsen or advanced.

What kind of position do you want or are good at? You can get fixed pawns, isolated pawns, advance centers, kingside attacks, queenside castling, and probably some other stuff. It's not going to be useful to play the "best line" and not know what to do.

I Have played both sides of the French Defence OTB, but now I stopped doing it with the black pieces. I also play the Tarrash against the French and think this is the strongest idea. Also I hated meeeting the Tarrasch with the black pieces, whereas, I loved when they played 3.e5 or 3.Nc3. After 3.e5 or 3.Nc3 the theory went on for many moves and I usually equalized comfortably. Tarrasch, on the other hand, was the reason I gave up the french.

3.Nc3 is White's Strongest.
3.e5 is a close second. (Originally thought to be as benign as the Exchange, but many new ideas for White that are very strong came about around 2006/2007)
3.exd5 and 3.Nd2 are utter crap and give White nothing. Easy Equality for Black in both cases.
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2?! c5!! and now:
A) 4.Ngf3 Nf6 5.e5 Nfd7 and White is stuck playing the Korchnoi Gambit instead of main line closed Tarrasch, which White has nothing with correct play by black.
B) 4.exd5 exd5! and now:
B1) 5.Bb5+ Bd7! 6.Qe2+ Be7! 7.dxc5 temporarily wins a pawn, but again, with correct play, Black will eventually get the pawn back and White has no advantage.
B2) 5.Nf3 Nf6! (FAR SUPERIOR to the old 5.Nc6?! 6.Bb5 Bd6 7.dxc5 Bxc5+/=) 6.Bb5+ Bd7 and again White has Nada!
well i would personally go with your b1/b2 line. although of course there are options. White has even had success with very modest stuff like 6 be2.
anyway you say black can eventually win the pawn back...i have no doubt that this is true. So ok white isnt winning immediately. great.
but white has no advantage? one most obvious thing we have is an isolated d pawn for black which is quite easily blockaded and will be a potential liability until the end of the friggen endgame. I just dont understand how you can assume white has 'nothing'....i have indeed won a fair number of games by simply winning that isolated d pawn. Thats a weakness that is not going to go away soon.
Even assuming that black wins the pawn back...the resulting position is going to be quite similar to the 5 nc6 line which you seem to think is +/= (i even think black can equalize that line as well) why would nc6 be +/= while your line is not?what is actually different about them? the nice thing about 5 nc6 is that black doesnt even have to worry about how to get the pawn back and can simply develop normally
This is where you lack an understanding in the position. It's not all just about blocking the isolated queen's pawn.
You need to understand how to execute IQP positions. In the line with Nc6, both the Knight and the Dark-Squared Bishop are misplaced. Black's knight should not be fighting for control of d4 and e5 (via sitting on c6). Black's key squares that he controls are c4 and e4, not e5 and d4.
After 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 (A knight on d2 versus a pawn on d5 is not a good combination for White) c5! 4.exd5 exd5 5.Ngf3 Nf6! 6.Bb5+ Bd7 7.Bxd7+ Nxd7 (This is where the Knight belongs in these lines, headed for c5 and eventually e4, NOT c6) 8.O-O Be7 (Not 8...Bd6, as in the ...Nc6 lines) 9.dxc5 Nxc5 10.Nb3 Nce4
This is the main line of the 5...Nf6 variation. Notice how far better placed Black's Knights are as opposed to c6 (which is 4 moves away from e4) and f6. Both White Knights are 4 moves away from d5. While they can block the pawn, they can't attack it, giving Black 2 major launching points at c4 and e4.
Also, it takes two weaknesses to overwork the Black pieces, but here, unlike in the 5...Nc6 lines, Black's idea is that you can't attack d5 very well anyway, so instead of trying to cover d5 and play for a draw, Black plays for more figuring you have no good way to attack d5 anyway, so Black takes on the typical attacking ideas in IQP play, despite the 1-move deficit compared to openings where White gets the IQP.
Black has equalized here. This position has occurred 281 times in the database on ChessTempo.com. The average rating for White is 2470, and the average performance by White here is 2446 (below par for White). The average score for White in chess is 54%. White is scoring 50.9% across the 281 games. Again, White should not be satisfied with this at all!
3.Nc3 and 3.e5 (only factoring games 2007-onward when the new ideas for White came about) are both stronger.
hey guys
need some help on what you should play against french thanks