What's wrong with this move for black?

Sort:
Andrewws

1. e4  e5  2. Bc4  Nf6  3. Nf3  Nxe4  4. Nc3  Nxc3  5. dxc3  f6  6. Nh4  g6  7. f4  c6  8. f5  d5  9. fxg6  dxc4  10. Qh5


10... Ke7

 


 


smartens

1 - It's a lot more helpful to post the whole game or a puzzle so we can play through the moves.

2 - 10...Ke2 is not possible on the board.

robot_house

he gets pushed out by Nf5 and then you have the knight guarding g7 to protect the incoming prawn fork

Andrewws
smartens wrote:

1 - It's a lot more helpful to post the whole game or a puzzle so we can play through the moves.

2 - 10...Ke2 is not possible on the board.


Sorry I meant 10...Ke7

 

I played this variation against a computer, and discovered the gambit myself, even though I later learned it was played in 3 previous master games recorded, and none of them played 10...Ke7

And many times as I pushed "Take back move" I could not get the computer program to play 10...Ke7.

 If you go here   http://www.chessok.com/?page_id=352  you shall discover why most computer programs will not accept pawn which allows the Boden Kieseritzky gambit, and instead will transpose to the Two Knights' Defense.

It is not totally sound for black, even though curiously enough there are hardly any modern grandmasters today who  play the 3.) Nf3 variation with the white pieces or 3.) Bc4 against the boring Petroff or Russian Defense, which would also be called the Italian-Russian Opening.