You should start your relationship by looking at opening principles first.
Who "decides" which opening to use?

Some openings are determined by the white pieces. Some are determined by the black pieces.
Also, within those systems you can have moves by either side that define a variation (A system within a system).
You are asking a very good question.
For example:
1.e4, e5 2.Nf3, Nc6 3.Bb5 is the Ruy Lopez.
Instead of 3.Bb5, white may play 3.Bc4 which is the Italian Game.
If black continues with 3...Bc5, we have the Guioco Piano variation of the Italian Game. White defined the opening; black defined the variation.
If white then continues with 4.b4, we have the Evans Gambit variation of the Guioco Piano within the Italian Game.
Another example is: 1.e4, c5 - Sicilian. Black defined the opening.
It might continue 2.Nf3, d6 3.d4, cd4 4.Nd4, Nf6 5.Nc3, a6. the move a6 defines the Najdorf. Black has other moves besides a6 and each of them have a name.
g6 - dragon
Nc6 - classical
e6 - Scheveningen
If after 5...a6 it might continue with 6.Bc4. This is called the Sozin.
That may seem like a lot of info, but it's not that hard to wrap your mind around it when you only study games that open with 1.e4. If thats the case, then....
e6 - french
e5 - can be a lot of things depending on what happens
d6 - Pirc
d5 - Scandinavian / Center Counter Defence
c6 - Caro Kann
c5 - Sicilian
Nf6 - Alekhines
There's others. You just need to look em up.

I think it goes like this
Opening (1st branching point)- Black
2nd Branch - White
3rd Branch- Black
4th Branch - White.
An example of this would be:

Have you noticed that your comments are usually pointless and unhelpful? You usually post diagrams with no written explanation whatsoever, and most of those diagrams are completely irrelevant.

Have you noticed that your comments are usually pointless and unhelpful? You usually post diagrams with no written explanation whatsoever, and most of those diagrams are completely irrelevant.
Have you ever noticed that you sometimes act like a moron. If you want to insult people this is not the place. Let me guess, you are not insulting anyone, and I'm not insulting anyone either. Who's irrelevant? Who you've been calling a moron?

eagiraud, don't waste your time. Leklerk (or another alias) does it on purpose.
It reminds these South park's episodes on trolls.

eagiraud, don't waste your time. Leklerk (or another alias) does it on purpose.
It reminds these South park's episodes on trolls.
What the [really don't need that, even obfuscated -- MOD] do you care?

Here, take this blunt, and let peace take over your mind:
[uncalled for -- MOD]

We are not teasing, we dont like to see your non-sense, it just takes space in the thread an doesnt apport anything for the conversation.

I have just reported BronsteinPawn. Just wondering.
I'm a beginner, investigating the idea of openings, and can't work something out. In the first part of the top answer on to this question on the Chess stack exchange the answerer "recommend[s] the Sicilian defense against 1.e4, and the King's Indian defense against everything else".
Regardless of whether that's sound advice or not, does this mean that it is ultimately black, with his response to whites initial move(s?), who determines which opening is played?
Related questions are, if this is the case, how can white prepare (strategize) for a game ahead of time?
The question at the bottom of all this is "where should I begin my relationship with openings?" Advice seems to vary from "you must know your openings" to "don't worry about openings and focus on (some other aspect)". In either case, I'd really like to have this mild confusion about how openings "work" cleared up and would appreciate any input.