They are theoretical artists, not Grand Prix barbarians
Also they probably know how to refute it
white's options are rather limited. there's f5 and bh6 ng5. there's e5. there's a3-b4 gambits. at present only the f5 lines survive as far as i know. and by survive i mean white is equal at best, with an overextended pawn structure to deal with. with the open sicilian white has much more to fight with. different plans. black has to know more.
Polgar used to play it.
well Polgar kind of died since she resigned from professional chess so she doesnt really count but yeah again this proves the point that while GM's play the grand prix, they would prefer more complexed grinding positions which have poisonous lines.
i mean....she still played those games lol. Perez and Topalov are both world class players
Many club players use the grand prix attack against the Sicilian, sometimes with Bc4 and sometimes with g3 and Bg2. It seems easy to play for white, simple plan of Qe1-h4, Ng5, and f5, and not so easy to defend with black. It also seems sound from a computer's prospective. I don't play the grand prix attack myself but it looks like a good option vs. the Sicilian. My question is why don't more top GM's play it? I mean, if it's so great, why aren't people like Nepo and Big Shak playing it?