How did we do in the match? Even Carlsen would not be able to stand up to Naka, Polgar, and the rest of the chess.com community...
Magnus Carlsen on Chess.com!

How did we do in the match? Even Carlsen would not be able to stand up to Naka, Polgar, and the rest of the chess.com community...
Carlsen won.

We lost. If you look at the other link I posted above, there is a run down by Danny Rensch, and David Pruess did the game analysis. The game itself is actually posted on that link along with pictures of Carlsen after he won.

If I remember correctly, Chess.com had Judit Polgar, Nakamura and one other on our side helping us.
I found GM JuditPolgar, GM Hikaru, and GM MangusCarlsen...

I think I remember Naka being blamed for suggesting and ultimately playing a ?! idea which was known to be iffy, and Magnus slowly turned it into an advantage, but I can't remember specifics lol.

Why does Nakamura get blamed for everything?
I think he's guilty more often than innocent

I think probably one of the highest. FYI, the highest correspondance player on the site is GM JUlio Beccera, at 2812, I believe. The highest-ranked player, Hikaru Nakamura, has a 1905 correspondance rating!

I hear that they blamed Nakamura for the loss. Is that true? I doubt he would have caused such a loss; he is a very competent player...

Jenium wrote:
Fixing_A_Hole wrote:
Magnus only plays on ICC, anonymously.
What is his anonymous ICC acount? ;)
Nunya D. Bizness lol...:-)

No one gives a fuck about carlson
The World Champion is Magnus Carlsen. He has beaten Vichy Anand twice in fair matches. Carlsen deserves your respect and I am sure that Anand would also ask you to respect him.
Anand was a worthy champion. He may yet have another chance at the title.
He sure is busy!