Atomic chess bs

Sort:
rychessmaster1
And now guess what my opponent played -_-

Rodgy

Uhh... Bxf2

Rodgy

I dunno lol

Brudo_the_Chess_King

oof

HarryMaguire-05

c6?

HorribleTomato

This is a legal move yes

Hey, isn't atomic chess a guaranteed win for white

Typewriter44
rychessmaster1 wrote:

Bxf2 is legal for SOME STUPID REASON in atomic -__________________-

wot

if you can't capture with your king (checkmate yourself)

why can you unpin a piece

Brudo_the_Chess_King
Typewriter44 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

Bxf2 is legal for SOME STUPID REASON in atomic -__________________-

wot

if you can't capture with your king (checkmate yourself)

why can you unpin a piece

I think its because Bxf2 Totally Blows up the king...

Chessisfunforme

yes

Typewriter44
Brudo_the_Chess_King wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

Bxf2 is legal for SOME STUPID REASON in atomic -__________________-

wot

if you can't capture with your king (checkmate yourself)

why can you unpin a piece

I think its because Bxf2 Totally Blows up the king...

but it puts your own king in check

you can't do that in standard chess

 

Brudo_the_Chess_King
Typewriter44 wrote:
Brudo_the_Chess_King wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

Bxf2 is legal for SOME STUPID REASON in atomic -__________________-

wot

if you can't capture with your king (checkmate yourself)

why can you unpin a piece

I think its because Bxf2 Totally Blows up the king...

but it puts your own king in check

you can't do that in standard chess

 

Yes but The Bishop blows up  the white King before its White's move.

Typewriter44
Brudo_the_Chess_King wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
Brudo_the_Chess_King wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

Bxf2 is legal for SOME STUPID REASON in atomic -__________________-

wot

if you can't capture with your king (checkmate yourself)

why can you unpin a piece

I think its because Bxf2 Totally Blows up the king...

but it puts your own king in check

you can't do that in standard chess

 

Yes but The Bishop blows up  the white King before its White's move.

so? you still can't put your own king in check. 

Brudo_the_Chess_King
Typewriter44 wrote:
Brudo_the_Chess_King wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
Brudo_the_Chess_King wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

Bxf2 is legal for SOME STUPID REASON in atomic -__________________-

wot

if you can't capture with your king (checkmate yourself)

why can you unpin a piece

I think its because Bxf2 Totally Blows up the king...

but it puts your own king in check

you can't do that in standard chess

 

Yes but The Bishop blows up  the white King before its White's move.

so? you still can't put your own king in check. 

Lets use the analogy of this.  The king sends the message for a piece to move.  okay, So if Bxf2 and the  white king is dead, so it cant send the order for the piece to kill Blacks King.

Typewriter44

you just love disagreeing with people don't you

 

in chess

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE A MOVE THAT PUTS YOUR OWN KING IN CHECK

regardless of anything else

Brudo_the_Chess_King
Typewriter44 wrote:

you just love disagreeing with people don't you

 

in chess

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE A MOVE THAT PUTS YOUR OWN KING IN CHECK

regardless of anything else

actually thats you.

Well this is not Chess. This is Atomic Chess. 

dax00

The reason why "check" exists in regular chess is because if you ignore a check or put your own king into check, then your opponent could just take your king. Basically, the only purpose is to allow stalemate. Otherwise, the goal of chess would simply be to capture the enemy king. 

In atomic chess, you can threaten to blow up the enemy king without giving it a conventional check. For this reason, it makes perfect sense for capture of the enemy king to be required.

BattleChessGN18

Personally, I'm not too sure why this is considered bs. I see nothing but a perfect demonstration of how this chess variant functions. 

 

BattleChessGN18

In this chess variant, exploding the King is the objective; in what is officially coined "atomic checkmate". The diagram you displays shows how you're supposed to win the game.

Now, my question is whether or not standard checkmate is a victory condition in this variant; or if check is still a condition that must be handled, much less checkmate. 

Chessplayer2093

KotH and. 3-check have the same rules as standard chess and just an additional way to win. Note that checkmate still ends the game in those two variants, hence “check“ is still a thing.

Atomic is different, the rules for captures are changed and you only win by blowing up the king.

Chessplayer2093
BattleChessGN18 hat geschrieben:

In this chess variant, exploding the King is the objective; in what is officially coined "atomic checkmate". The diagram you displays shows how you're supposed to win the game.

Now, my question is whether or not standard checkmate is a victory condition in this variant; or if check is still a condition that must be handled, much less checkmate. 

Yes, as long as your king can't be blown up immediately.