Chessdivers ELO?

Sort:
ppulik

Ok, thanks. To be precise - is it bot win ratio or win ratio of community vs this particular bot?

BlackdriftWhitefrost

Click on analysis and their elo will be shown : scanner 550, fighter 1300, pincer 1650

RyanZ_MD

I defeated all 3 of them, and my rating is only 1100. So, I will say none of them are too powerful.

Khnemu_Nehep

It's not the win % of the bot. It's the % of the objective to defeat them.
When we reach 100% on all 3 we win, i guess.

BeatTheBots
Khnemu_Nehep wrote:

It's not the win % of the bot. It's the % of the objective to defeat them.
When we reach 100% on all 3 we win, i guess.

I suspect when one, or maybe all three are at 100% a new one, or two or three, will show up. Three seems an atypically small group for a themed month based on a popular video game. And while pincher had some tricks in its claws, 1650 seems a little on the low side for the trend in final bots too. Quite fine with me if they end one at 1600, I'd much rather see that than some 2600 beast, but I suspect this theme won't be over just yet.

Dr_BlP

Wouldn't the threshold have to be some point less than 100% ?

A single bot victory would make 100% impossible to achieve without other applicable rules or constraints.

Khnemu_Nehep
Dr_BlP wrote:

Wouldn't the threshold have to be some point less than 100% ?

A single bot victory would make 100% impossible to achieve without other applicable rules or constraints.

No, you don't get it. We don't need to have 100% win rate. We need to have 100% of the total number of wins. There's a set number of wins we need to achieve.

Dr_BlP

Got it, thanks for the explanation.

parking_turkeys
Also you can see that there will be more in the image for the ios update
nico3173

Crusher is good

nov04-inactive

they added 4th bot?

ChessBoi3999
nov04-inactive wrote:

they added 4th bot?

yeah yeah it's crusher

he's stuck at 25%

Arthur-Lemuel

if you look to the file and look for the last time when you play with then you can see a ELO

BeatTheBots
Arthur-Lemuel wrote:

if you look to the file and look for the last time when you play with then you can see a ELO

Tough indeed - like 2500 tough, #5 if out there has to be Magnus tough, and if 6 exists maybe Mittens tough!

I played it for about an hour last night thinking something like 2000 would be next, only to get decimated between 20-30 moves several times. Finally got an advantage, up 5 with over half the pieces off the board, and one misclick ended that. Quickly turned a now even game into flushing me again, but seeing the ratings on review I felt a little less foolish. I don't take much stock in the review ratings, but it gave us like 1800 each; I was happy enough the review gave equal ratings despite my demise.

McShubhsy

Scanner has to be 500, Fighter like a 1200, Pincer has to be 1800 or 2000 and Crusher a GM

SliverWoIf
Pincer blundered his queen in a game. I won. Easily. Best bot I have beaten is Isabel.
faeth070

Crusher has to be at least 2000+.

BeatTheBots
faeth070 wrote:

Crusher has to be at least 2000+.

Check a game review: You'll see 2500 behind its name.

The review - whatever that's worth - gave us both in the 1800s and 1900s for the game on the three games I reviewed - maybe 2 of the 3 in my favor, though I'd say moot with the loss regardless. Those were ones I came close to a win, so I don't think nearly invincible unless programmed to get stronger throughout the game - and then still would be vulnerable to the human capitalizing early. However, it had "crushed" me good several times before each of them.

JBarryChess

Pincer is history. I'll have to try the next one.