Do you like vote chess?

Sort:
kokino

Do you like vote chess? Do you enjoy interacting with other members, even Master level?

Do you believe that vote chess is one of the best tools to improve your chess?

 

 

 

Then you have to join the best groups in vote chess:

- If you live in the European Union,

 European Union Team 

(aprox. 630 members)

 Vote Chess

 

- For other players... please join the most compensated and active vote chess group in chess.com:

BLACK OR WHITE          

(Aprox. 350 members)

Vote Chess

 

If you are asking yourself, why they are the best, simply take a look on the vote chess leaderboard. (here)

kokino
BorgQueen wrote:

It's growing on me, but I am already a member of what I believe to be the best vote chess group in chess.com.   Never have I seen a team more organised or more communicative.

And the VC leaderboard is a farce.  I am much more impressed with undefeated teams than those at like 75% wins but with more "points".

All the teams with 100% wins should be AT THE TOP.


 Absolutely, I have asked several times to change the leaderboard... maybe would be nice to include a Elo Rating to give a clear idea of the groups potential... with the current leaderboard, you have no clue!

 

Take a look here:

VOTE CHESS RATING INSTEAD OF FIXED SCORING SYSTEM

ilikeflags
scottk74 wrote:

no


Nabeal

Hey Manny! Where do WEEEEEEE stand? Frown

kokino
NabeelDaSorcerer wrote:

Hey Manny! Where do WEEEEEEE stand?


 Hey, our group no need promotion... :)

kokino
rcet wrote:

I don't mean to be a killjoy .......Why re-invent the wheel

I prefer the conventional game the business on voting each move

is democracy gone mad as far as i am concerned.


 It is not about democracy and/ or imposing ideas. It is simply about enjoying good games. If you go throught our games archive you will see that we enjoy the games at the time we learn a lot (at least that's my case)... to call it vote chess is not what really matters... (I would say, that even winning or losing is not the important point either, is the team work, members relationships and chess mentoring what really matters)

rooperi
kokino wrote:
rcet wrote:

I don't mean to be a killjoy .......Why re-invent the wheel

I prefer the conventional game the business on voting each move

is democracy gone mad as far as i am concerned.


 It is not about democracy and/ or imposing ideas. It is simply about enjoying good games. If you go throught our games archive you will see that we enjoy the games at the time we learn a lot (at least that's my case)... to call it vote chess is not what really matters... (I would say, that even winning or losing is not the important point either, is the team work, members relationships and chess mentoring what really matters)


I agree, a better name would probably be consultation chess.

I find it extremely helpful to get access to stronger players' thinking processes during the game. There are a few groups who do this well, and a few that don't. I don't play vaote chess in those.

MOR1

KING'S GAME

THAT'S ENOUGH