Chocolate man is back
How you deal with trash player?
Sort:
Jul 25, 2022
0
#3
Hararepraisethelord hat geschrieben:
If you don’t know who the trash is, maybe you’re it
Please don't take it personally.
Jul 25, 2022
0
#4
well if they play bad on purpose then you have a better chance to win and play with somebody stronger after that who will not do this..
You beat them.
#1
What is the problem? You won.
2 Nc3 is a dubious move: 2 c4 or 2 e4 or 2 Nf3 are good moves.
Jul 25, 2022
0
#7
tygxc hat geschrieben:
#1
What is the problem? You won.
2 Nc3 is a dubious move: 2 c4 or 2 e4 or 2 Nf3 are good moves.
I dont care about online game win/loses. 2. Nc3 is Jobava London System, a modern opening.
The problem is like I said that player like this waste my time. I could have an opponent who wants to win and play good moves. The chance to lose for me will be higher but the chance to learn from better opponents too
Jul 25, 2022
0
#8
Uživatel tygxc napsal:
#1
What is the problem? You won.
2 Nc3 is a dubious move: 2 c4 or 2 e4 or 2 Nf3 are good moves.
bruh.. how is developing a knight to the most natural place a dubious move...
Jul 25, 2022
0
#9
Uživatel Fokuskeks napsal:
tygxc hat geschrieben:
#1
What is the problem? You won.
2 Nc3 is a dubious move: 2 c4 or 2 e4 or 2 Nf3 are good moves.
I dont care about online game win/loses. 2. Nc3 is Jobava London System, a modern opening.
The problem is like I said that player like this waste my time. I could have an opponent who wants to win and play good moves. The chance to lose for me will be higher but the chance to learn from better opponents too
mhm.. maybe you can try a longer time control? I would think that with more time people play more seriously but I could be wrong.. many people don't wanna play some deep theory so they play a bit unusual openings to get out from famous lines.. tho playing something like e6 d6 c6 b6 is quite uh.. bad..
You have to be at a higher Elo to play better opponents. And to be at a higher Elo, you have to defeat the worse opponents, all of whom, by definition, play less-than-good moves
You beat them so I don’t know why you’re asking this question. Punish whatever wrong thing they did
Jul 25, 2022
0
#12
Fokuskeks wrote:
tygxc hat geschrieben:
#1
What is the problem? You won.
2 Nc3 is a dubious move: 2 c4 or 2 e4 or 2 Nf3 are good moves.
I dont care about online game win/loses. 2. Nc3 is Jobava London System, a modern opening.
The problem is like I said that player like this waste my time. I could have an opponent who wants to win and play good moves. The chance to lose for me will be higher but the chance to learn from better opponents too
i was gonna say that you won't face these bad players at the 2000+ rating, then i looked at your rating LMAO.
I wouldn’t say it’s dubious. It reminds me of some kind of jobava London but with the wrong move order or something. Generally the c pawn wants to contribute to central control, creating a pawn duo with the d pawn, or supporting the d pawn.
Never mind, you’re like 2000….
Never mind, you’re like 2000….
You beat them and then move on with your life
Jul 25, 2022
0
#15
Pretty obvious you cheated against @Rubenpekasau in the rematch... I also suspect in the game you're bragging about.
There are some other fishy games too... a cheater calling other players "trash" is pretty annoying.
Jul 25, 2022
0
#16
Looking at your rematches against @dz_ti and @fkbm1 too... you sure do like winning in under 20 moves with 90+% accuracy against players who beat you the first game...
There are some other signs too but since you're too dumb to hide it I'd rather not educate you so that you become better at this...
Jul 25, 2022
0
#17
Uživatel nMsALpg napsal:
Looking at your rematches against @dz_ti and @fkbm1 too... you sure do like winning in under 20 moves with 90+% accuracy against players who beat you the first game...
There are some other signs too but since you're too dumb to hide it I'd rather not educate you so that you become better at this...
high accuracy itself in one game proves nothing
if you think that he cheated for whatever reason then report him but proclaiming it in public forum is stupid...
Jul 25, 2022
0
#18
FoxWithNekoEars wrote:
high accuracy itself in one game proves nothing
I completely agree. I've seen 1000 rated players get 98% games and I have no problem with it. I'm not only looking at the percent, I'm looking at the moves themselves... for example when a move makes no sense but it happens to be the engine's top pick. Or when easy moves take the same amount of time as difficult moves.
FoxWithNekoEars wrote:
if you think that he cheated for whatever reason then report him
I did report him.
If he isn't banned then it means chess.com is idiots.
But hey, I did my part.
FoxWithNekoEars wrote:
proclaiming it in public forum is stupid...
Cheaters p*ss me off. I don't mind shaming him even if it's against the rules. If they want to mute me for it go ahead, I don't care.
Jul 25, 2022
0
#19
Oh, you're that person I argued with for a long time about always reporting people who beat you in rapid games (if your rating is high).
Check out the game history in this link:
https://www.chess.com/member/moem1958
Hey guys,
I played some games and I want learn things for real chess games. But so many player dont want to play normal. They play stupid openings, play to much pawns or failed gambits. Things that nobody will play in a normal over the board game. They waste my time, in this time I could get an opponent who wants to play good moves. How do you deal with this player?
Here is one of my last games (I was white) against a player who is in my rating (it hurt to write this because he played very bad on purpose), so you know what kind of trash opening I mean.