I am 1200 and won a game with 94 accuracy against a 1900. Im worried that I will get banned
Sort:
Jan 28, 2023
0
#3
FearFichille22 wrote:
I recently won a game won a game against an 1900 with 94 percent accuracy. He played badly and it was a 25 move game. Will I get banned?
Yup. You almost got away with it, but then you had to post about it. 
Jan 28, 2023
0
#4
FearFichille22 wrote:
I recently won a game won a game against an 1900 with 94 percent accuracy. He played badly and it was a 25 move game. Will I get banned?
If you're playing fairly, you have nothing to worry about.
TheNameofNames wrote:
hes playing like 87 percent against 2000s and 1900s, not to mention how is he even playing against people that highly rated that in itself is weird
To play against higher rated players you go into custom game then open challenges. Here you can see the rating of your opponent before playing them. I like the challenge of playing higher rated players and you don't lose many points when you lose. This is the first time I have actually won against one.
It’s hard to find quite a few of those moves at 1200 but if it was legit you should be fine
Jan 28, 2023
0
#7
High accuracy against someone blundering full pieces is expected if you play a solid game. Besides, that's not how chess com detects cheating. It'll examine many more of your games, as well as lots of other things, such as browser events like switching tabs, etc.
Jan 28, 2023
0
#8
Yes, worrying about something that will certainly happen is quite a waste of time,
Jan 28, 2023
0
#9
@FearFichille22, they're just teasing you. If you played the game honestly, then you have nothing at all to worry about and can lock this forum since you have your answer. @Martin_Stahl is a chess.com staff, he knows what he's talking about.
Jan 28, 2023
0
#10
FullCrowdedBadger wrote:
@FearFichille22, they're just teasing you. If you played the game honestly, then you have nothing at all to worry about and can lock this forum since you have your answer. @Martin_Stahl is a chess.com staff, he knows what he's talking about.
Martin is actually a mod, not staff.
So the rest of the info might also be wrong.
Be afraid, op. Be very afraid.
Jan 28, 2023
0
#11
idilis wrote:
FullCrowdedBadger wrote:
@FearFichille22, they're just teasing you. If you played the game honestly, then you have nothing at all to worry about and can lock this forum since you have your answer. @Martin_Stahl is a chess.com staff, he knows what he's talking about.
Martin is actually a mod, not staff.
So the rest of the info might also be wrong.
Be afraid, op. Be very afraid.
Even still, if @Martin_Stahl is a moderator than chess.com had to reach out to him at some point, it also means that chess.com trusts him, therefore you should too.
Jan 28, 2023
0
#12
FullCrowdedBadger wrote:
Even still, if @Martin_Stahl is a moderator than chess.com had to reach out to him at some point, it also means that chess.com trusts him, therefore you should too.
How long should the chain of delegated trust be? Is the organization a single link in this chain or is it also made up of people firming longer links in the chain? Should mine be as long as yours? So many questions...
Jan 28, 2023
0
#13
If you play very well, you are bound to get a good accuracy score
But if it remains high all the time, then it might raise suspicions among members
If you are playing fairly, don't worry about it
I recently won a game won a game against an 1900 with 94 percent accuracy. He played badly and it was a 25 move game. Will I get banned?