Please block me before I do something stupid. Thank you in advance.
I think everyone who has ever beaten me is a cheater

Let's say you're theoretically blocked, then; in both of our minds you'll be blocked, but I won't actually do anything and it'll have absolutely no effect.

Clock hacking is one of the main ways people cheat. Which way their pieces point obviously has advantages which translate into cheating. Not resigning is cheating... yeah, I'm with you!

Let's say you're theoretically blocked, then; in both of our minds you'll be blocked, but I won't actually do anything and it'll have absolutely no effect.
Okay...so, I'm not actually saying the following.
I think Tryst being smarter than me is cheating. By the by, now I know why my wristwatch is always off...damn hackers.

Clock hacking is one of the main ways people cheat. Which way their pieces point obviously has advantages which translate into cheating. Not resigning is cheating... yeah, I'm with you!
And Djokovic, he obviously cheated, too.

are you the top secret system that chess.com uses to prove that people are cheating?
Yes. I'm Magnus Carlsen after drinking a smoothie of the liquified remains of... actually, I won't go any further. Too disgusting.

Clock hacking is one of the main ways people cheat. Which way their pieces point obviously has advantages which translate into cheating. Not resigning is cheating... yeah, I'm with you!
And Djokovic, he obviously cheated, too.
yes...

The problem is he's made it very difficult; when it was Del Potro - Federer, they were both super-cool so it wasn't so bad that Fed lost. Now it's like a douche-off final, and it's too hard to decide who to root against.
You can't even choose their accompanying family, because Toni is awful, and Novak's father wears that damned stupid shirt. If only Miguel Angel Nadal would turn up, then I'd have to support Rafa
Moderator: since going to the microsoft school of forums, i have recently learned that tennis posts are off topic at a chess site and should be deleted. well, it think it was about tennis. all i see is "blah blah blah Federer blah blah blah Fed blah". so even if it is not about tennis, it is over my head and should be deleted anyway. Thanks Moderator, i await your response.

I don't even see why they're playing this match. Once Djokevic started cheating, Federer won. Djokovic should be suspended.

Good point. I'm not going to renew my diamond membership unless Erik steps in and stops this farce of a final.
Good point. I'm not going to renew my diamond membership unless Erik steps in and stops this farce of a final.
hahaha

no, I simply want complete agreement with all of my premises, and/or comments about how damned sexy I am. You may be blocked otherwise.
No comment.

Good point. I'm not going to renew my diamond membership unless Erik steps in and stops this farce of a final.
And Djokovic should be put on trial! Joan of arc was put on trial, what makes Djokovic think he's better than Joan of arc?

no, I simply want complete agreement with all of my premises, and/or comments about how damned sexy I am. You may be blocked otherwise.
The only possible explanations for statements like the above:
1. You are Windows-7_ using a proxy.
2. You are a sockpuppet of Windows-7_.
3. You are a clone of Windows-7_.
4. You are a podperson ("Windows-7_ is not Windows-7_ !")
5. You are Erik pretending to be Windows-7_ as a devious way to promote chess.com.
To claim to be "theoreticalboy" is simply naive, patently laughable, and I simply won't hear of it.
So, you think you've got it all figured out, do you? Well I ask of you; who is the real box man here?
(yikes, need a distraction) Hey! Know what I love? 90s jangly Siouxsie and the Banshees!
Good point. I'm not going to renew my diamond membership unless Erik steps in and stops this farce of a final.
And Djokovic should be put on trial! Joan of arc was put on trial, what makes Djokovic think he's better than Joan of arc?
i'm tired of waiting for the moderator. wow trysts, you really have a thing for R-Fed.
The way I see it, I sit down and make all these moves which seem so great to me, but I still lose! I don't see any explanation other than foul play, because there's no way so many people can continually see these mega-complex pawn forks and attacking pins etc so often.
Now, before you chess.com naysayers start responding, I don't want any discussion about whether my losses might be due to my total lack of talent for the game, or whether or not the extra 5 points added to a 1700 rating an opponent might gain from cheating against me is feasibly even worth switching a computer on; no, I simply want complete agreement with all of my premises, and/or comments about how damned sexy I am. You may be blocked otherwise.
So who's with me?