Is it bad sportsmanship to refuse to resign when you are in a severely losing position?

Sort:
JediMindTrick32

Especially if your opponent outplays you in the opening or middle game, and you're at a huge disadvantage (like a full queen or worse). I've been running into a lot of people who refuse to resign, then try to find the sharpest possible moves to goad me into making a silly mistake.

I can, of course, just be very careful in those situations and win 99% of the time, it's just bad manners for someone to force the issue like that. I think it's a complete waste of time solely for the purpose of trying to tilt someone or maliciously 'trick' them.

I can't decide whether that behavior deserves a 'thumbs down' or not at the end of the game.

Skittles_Room_GM

As a competitive person (not to say I'm good enough to play competitively, but in general) I tend to fight to the end. I resign when I have no fighting chance (I won't make you chase a king for 10 turns just because).

 

But, I feel chess is more of a "gentleman's game" (or gentlelady), and in that regard, I think it would be considered better mannered to resign in these situations.

 

In the end, I don't have a problem with the game going to the end, if I mess up, that's on me, and if I catch my opponent in a blunder end-game, I'll take the chance for a come-back win.

 

I feel similarly in bullet chess (1|0). I'll be winning or very near to mate, and the other person will just make random moves to time me out. 

 

It's frustrating, but I don't fault the player either. They want to win as bad as I do. They just found an annoying way to do it ll

IcyAvaleigh
yeah this is exactly why the thumbs up/down system is a bad system I think. people who are just annoyed or frustrated are not able to accurately judge the sportmanship of their opponent.

if your opponent is rude or break the rules, report them. the thumb-system gains no accurate info since it is a matter of opinion and feelings
OpenSquirrel
If someone wants to carry on to the end of the game that’s their choice. There’s no reason not to on a chess site, it’s not an insult unless you are playing a top professional.
Pat_Zurr

You pull your Jedi mind tricks on them yet you deny others the chance to maliciously trick you....come on now, fair is fair.happy.png

DrChesspain

As long as you're not stalling there is nothing wrong with playing until the bitter end. 

hayden_wills

I might resign if i see that there is nothing i can do to win the game. Let's say that you are white, and you only have your knight, bishop, rook, and a couple of pawns, and of course king, while your opponent(black) has queen, king, both rooks, a knight, both bishops and a couple of pawns as well, then I would play then if my opponent keeps attacking my king with his king then I would resign. The match would be 6 vs 9.

sndeww

generally... yes (to the title question)

serverbusy
JediMindTrick32 wrote:

Especially if your opponent outplays you in the opening or middle game, and you're at a huge disadvantage (like a full queen or worse). I've been running into a lot of people who refuse to resign, then try to find the sharpest possible moves to goad me into making a silly mistake.

I can, of course, just be very careful in those situations and win 99% of the time, it's just bad manners for someone to force the issue like that. I think it's a complete waste of time solely for the purpose of trying to tilt someone or maliciously 'trick' them.

I can't decide whether that behavior deserves a 'thumbs down' or not at the end of the game.

no

NikkiLikeChikki
If you are low rated, play on since blunders are common. If you are high rated, it’s probably best to resign. If you are in the middle, meh... probably if it’s like +10.