It's Another Rollover! (Essential Chess Types)

Sort:
artfizz

While we wait for the super-duper feature

  • Rollover actions on a player name (rating, current games, etc)
to be implemented that will give instant information about another person (and potential opponent!), we could re-use the existing facilities to provide a clue to our Essential Chess Type. By using a simple 3-character code at the start of My Status, we could indicate where we stand on the Big Three:

Preference

Symbol

Preference

Symbol

Use DBs, books, etc. during play (Correspondence Chess rules

+

No DBs, no books, no Analysis Board during play (OTB rules)

-

Never Resign

#

Resign

R

Talkative

T

Quiet

Q

                                      Version 1.0
Which symbols would be the most meaningful?
RyanMK

I'm a +RT

MainStreet

Great idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"My Status" now reads: "-RQ"

Am3692

I really like this idea, that would help if you want to find and play players that share the same ... I don't know the right word for it... but the same something as you. (Interests? styles? rules? ugh really can't find the right word for it)

artfizz

Am3692 wrote: I really like this idea, that would help if you want to find and play players that share the same ... I don't know the right word for it... but the same something as you. (Interests? styles? rules? ugh really can't find the right word for it)

outlook? attitude? approach?

You could decide that, for example, type +#T was compatible with type -RT    if neither use of Correspondence Chess-style facilities nor resign/don't resign mattered that much to you.

notgm

you need symbols for the in-betweeners.  i'm a -rt.  little r for sometimes resign, and little t for sometimes talkative.

RyanMK

Hey PerfectGent, we are the same.

artfizz

notgm cleverly suggested: you need symbols for the in-betweeners.  i'm a -rt.  little r for sometimes resign, and little t for sometimes talkative.

That's going to be a problem finding a representation for little #, + or -  ... do we need to go with Letters? In any case, # indicates a ideological stand against resigning i.e. NEVER RESIGN!; whereas R indicates a person will resign in some circumstances not necessarily always. R & r is an interesting refinement though.

Here's a list of the 8 combinations taht make up our Essential Chess Type. If they had snappy names: lion, hyena, fox, worm, rabbit, dolphin, etc., would they be easier to talk about? Suggestions?

+#T, AFT  ANT (Additional, Never Resign, Talkative)
-#T, HFT  
+RT, ART  RAT (Resign, Additional, Talkative), pArRoT?
-RT, HRT  THRush (Talkative, Head-only, Resign)
+#Q, AFQ  FOX
-#Q, HFQ  
+RQ, ARQ  ORC
-RQ, HRQ  HeRO 
artfizz

PerfectGent wrote: im definitely a +RT ...

 

If only I'd suggested A for Additional/Analysis,  PerfectGent would have wrote

(albeit somewhat ungrammatically) : im definitely a ART

artfizz

PerfectGent wrote: 


No, I hadn't remarked on them - but they are rather remarkable, now that you draw my attention to them. http://www.chess.com/photos/view_album/PerfectGent/all-my-own-work

JRadis

artfizz wrote:

PerfectGent wrote: im definitely a +RT ...

 

If only I'd suggested A for Additional/Analysis,  PerfectGent would have wrote

(albeit somewhat ungrammatically) : im definitely a ART


 Isnt it an?

Anyway good idea... Think that I would be a -RT 

chrish

I'm in

notgm

for the sometime analytical tool user, i suggest 0.

artfizz

While we wait for the super-duper feature

  • Rollover actions on a player name (rating, current games, etc)
 to be implemented that will give instant information about another person (and potential opponent!), we could re-use the existing facilities to provide a clue. By using a simple 3-character code at the start of My Status, we could indicate where we stand (our attitude/tendency/views) on the Big Three:

Preference
Sym
Preference
Sym
Preference
Sym

Use DBs, books, Analytical tools etc. during play 

(Correspondence Chess rules)

+ or A

Occasional use of DBs, books, Analytical tools etc. during play

(Correspondence Chess rules)

0 (zero) or a
No DBs, no books, no Analysis Board during play (OTB rules)
- or H
Never Resign
# or F
Occasionally Resign
r
Regularly Resign
R
Talkative
T
Occasionally Talkative
t or q
Quiet
Q

                                                             Version 2.0

 A = Additional/Analysis Tools     F = Fight on to the bitter end    H = use Head only

Many excellent suggestions. Further refinement invited.    ARTREF:ESSENTIAL CHESS TYPE

onosson

What you are proposing will reduce forum traffic drastically!  Whatever will we talk about now?

 

btw, I suppose I would be an 0rq (ORC?).  I never can make up my mind.

artfizz

onosson wrote: What you are proposing will reduce forum traffic drastically!  Whatever will we talk about now? ...

I wouldn't be too sure...

"Meanwhile, the poor Babel fish, by effectively removing all barriers to communication between different races and cultures, has caused more and bloodier wars than anything else in the history of creation." (Douglas Adams)

onosson also wrote: btw, I suppose I would be an 0rq (ORC?).  I never can make up my mind.

Are you really a ORC? You claim to be Quiet yet you continually post in the Forums! Even a whiff of Correspondence Chess facilities use taints you for all eternity - unless you admit the error of your ways. You assert you have Resignation tendencies yet I'm sure I can find at least one game in which you did not resign at the correct point.

artfizz

Here's an updated list of the 8 combinations (of attitudes towards the BIG THREE chess.com controversies) that make up our Essential Chess Type:

+#T, AFT  ANT (Additional, Never Resign, Talkative)
-#T, HFT  
+RT, ART  RAT (Resign, Additional, Talkative)
-RT, HRT  THRush (Talkative, Head-only, Resign)
+#Q, AFQ  
-#Q, HFQ  
+RQ, ARQ  ORC
-RQ, HRQ  HeRO 

 

Some interesting naming suggestions. Just need a few more (or alternatives) ...

CutPriceKarpov

- R T, well at least i try to be...

xqsme

To AM3692 #4  how about word "notions "

artfizz

xqsme wrote: To AM3692 #4  how about word "notions "

WVSFielding wrote: - R T, well at least i try to be...


So WVSFielding, you are only notionally - R T

How are we going to get this scheme rolled out notionwide?