Lack of decorum

Sort:
norty

I played <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> (1027 today and although I truly played badly, I don't think that it was appropriate to say "you suck".

[It is against site policy to accuse other members by name in the public forum.

Moderator]

SylvXIII

That's common. People often say (for instance about food) that it is "bad" rather than "I don't like it". It's much more approriate (and polite) to say you don't like it since there are people out there who love the food (or thing) in question.

As you wrote yourself, you played badly and your opponent was simply bad mannered about it.

dannyhume

Yeah I was playing <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> who was a total douchebag and a cheat and also <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> who was a total douchebag and a cheat and finally <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> who was a total douchebag and a cheat.  It was bad enough playing such douchebags but then on the forums I had to keep reading comments from <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> who is notorious for being a total douchebag and a cheat and also <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> who is a total douchebag and a cheat.  Anyway, I thought I'd just list everyone I know on these forums who is a douchebag and a cheat and they are the following...

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

<NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR>,

dannyhume

I'll continue the list later since I am tired of writing these names down.

1pawndown

You seem like a real d-bag yourself.

TheGrobe

Hey, five posts and this thread's living up to its title.

Good work everyone.

dannyhume
1pawndown wrote:

You seem like a real d-bag yourself.


Nice try fisherman, but that bait won't get you on the list...it's called "strict objective criteria accounting for my error-free emotionally-unbiased observations"*** (unlike those made by <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> and <NAME DELETED BY MODERATOR> for instance, neither of whom have any standards, accountability, or integrity for anything ever).   

***copyright 2011 dannyhume. All rights reserved.

pinkblueecho
GMproposedsolutions hat geschrieben:

I'd guess this would be a example whereby a moderator would consider if there's any worth in keeping this for our record of human civilization.

 

You didn´t have to bump this trash.

Woollysock
Bumping is only done on Sunday ! ......this is a blatant breach of the house rules ! 😤👎
Woollysock
You said “ “ can make much be useless “ 🤷‍♂️....don’t get that at all
TheBestBeer_Root
GMproposedsolutions wrote:

Well, I think it'd be fun to empty trash. Who, besides myself would enjoy looking at old posts and marking them for deletion? I think it'd be more fun than cleaning up a messy room.

 

You wonder why this site even retains threads serving no useful purpose. This would include some of my threads as well as the time of the postings can make much be useless.

 

Let's say there are 50 instance of the same type of word game and there are several active at the moment. What's the point in seeing any that have been inactive for over three years? It's not like any of these would be a useful reference for anything.

Agreed, given the threads were actually the majority useless ones belonging in the trash, deleted, yeah! We would lmao easily see hundreds, multi hundreds of pages wiped lol out of the forums past threads from many years ago created 😂

 

....that actually could be cool, like keep the main one hundred threads of each forum and that be it, the rest removed or at least placed in an additional archived area that they easily are able to handle. Tom, maybe message cc about this and if they need your help volunteer, let me know what becomes of it, yeah?

CrockPotLion

Grow up?

Woollysock
Yeah ! ......grow up 😾
CrockPotLion

Far too much immaturity on forum.

Infidel_Catto

the moderator says the opee was “accusing” someone. said moderator could have checked the game chitchat to see if it was more than an accusation. it becomes clear then why said moderator remained nameless.

Woollysock
I see Bishop is still playing with his toys again ! ........mummy will be pleased ......bless his little tootsies ✌️😎
Woollysock
Time to change your naps Bishop ........don’t wanna upset mummy now do we ! .........run along now , theirs a good boy 👦
TheBestBeer_Root
CrackPipeLion wrote:

Far too much immaturity on forum.

You say that and your username is crackpipelion?????

...are you aware what the word means? mature.. it sure has nothing to do with any pipe with uhhhh your other preferenced part of ur username 

....maybe we maturely can private chat, yeah?

destroyer8470_Inactive

Me: Typing comment

Me *sees all things deleted by moderator*

Hey guys, I LOVE CHESSDOTCOM!!

CrockPotLion

And serious Chess player... are intelligent? How dumb are the dumber people?!